Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 29 Jun 2023 22:14:42 -0400
Message-ID: <f43449f878f629805d5de7fd06306741.paul@paul-moore.com>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To:     Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        john.johansen@canonical.com, mic@digikod.net
Cc:     linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
        serge@hallyn.com, keescook@chromium.org,
        penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/11] LSM: Three basic syscalls
References: <20230629195535.2590-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230629195535.2590-1-casey@schaufler-ca.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Jun 29, 2023 Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> 
> Add three system calls for the Linux Security Module ABI ...

I saw two small things (see patches 7/11 and 8/11) when looking at the
patchset today, but otherwise it looks pretty good to me.  However,
before I can merge this, at a minimum I would like to get an ACK from
John on the AppArmor patch; an ACK or a Reviewed-by on the rest of the
patchset would be great too.  I know Mickaël has reviewed and commented
on this patchset before, it would be nice if we could get his
ACK/Reviewed-by too.  Of course reviews and comments are always welcome
from anyone who has looked over the code; this is an important patchset
so the more eyes the better.

Assuming no one catches anything further, I think we can get this into
the lsm/next branch as soon as the merge window closes.

Thanks for all your work on this Casey.

--
paul-moore.com