Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Fri, 30 Jun 2023 07:19:03 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Daniel =?iso-8859-1?Q?D=EDaz?= <daniel.diaz@linaro.org>
Cc:     stable@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org,
        patches@kernelci.org, lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, pavel@denx.de,
        jonathanh@nvidia.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de,
        conor@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.3 00/29] 6.3.11-rc1 review
Message-ID: <2023063037-matrix-urologist-030d@gregkh>
References: <20230629184151.705870770@linuxfoundation.org>
 <CAEUSe7__cNqH6d1D96m8XriVckS9MnL6CRfd+iTYXnNkqu9nvQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAEUSe7__cNqH6d1D96m8XriVckS9MnL6CRfd+iTYXnNkqu9nvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 03:54:03PM -0600, Daniel D?az wrote:
> Hello!
> 
> Early report of failures.
> 
> Arm64 fails with GCC-11 on the following configurations:
> * lkftconfig
> * lkftconfig-64k_page_size
> * lkftconfig-debug
> * lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak
> * lkftconfig-kasan
> * lkftconfig-kselftest
> * lkftconfig-kunit
> * lkftconfig-libgpiod
> * lkftconfig-perf
> * lkftconfig-rcutorture
> 
> lkftconfig is basically defconfig + a few fragments [1]. The suffixes
> mean that we're enabling a few other kconfigs.
> 
> Failure:
> -----8<-----
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c: In function 'do_page_fault':
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:576:9: error: 'vma' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'vmap'?
>   576 |         vma = lock_mm_and_find_vma(mm, addr, regs);
>       |         ^~~
>       |         vmap
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:576:9: note: each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> /builds/linux/arch/arm64/mm/fault.c:579:17: error: label 'done' used
> but not defined
>   579 |                 goto done;
>       |                 ^~~~
> make[4]: *** [/builds/linux/scripts/Makefile.build:252:
> arch/arm64/mm/fault.o] Error 1
> make[4]: Target 'arch/arm64/mm/' not remade because of errors.
> ----->8-----

Is this also failing in Linus's tree?

thanks,

greg k-h