Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp23122032rwd; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:46:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlExtGt607MYRfHLcDes4BGrjiw1LTQfB7kSYZopyqcpxDeSbi6lV77DplIackxYHEu3mAoh X-Received: by 2002:a92:4b04:0:b0:345:c0ec:a0df with SMTP id m4-20020a924b04000000b00345c0eca0dfmr3744612ilg.4.1688176008673; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:46:48 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688176008; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DRT+ZqgqzCoYJWRXlqHjRdgzQ13Hy8kgpLEaYk/sc9iTK2A1dUSgjEdSG0sH1FXMjM ERs7SnG4UFln5Olmb7Djk/kG8/OsiLTjl3qqdPAV9LgGrHLLManyaQq2sH0Z+ilfhfDz YE5p6NixtJuKCG7bk9MgqNG16Rc4TPBsX6KFrpmAjGx0/SCDTePoazzSUbothaRdq1ON sawYInlrh/fBn66RrilGnzEI/ng3wxy8N4NssCBVNl58NI+48g4S7HID1eZ6SSbqq56x yYBxTVhmAoWl80p0FEEHGakJhsncVgc/GA9zJ/0a/mgYzwkpTmVfYgCO0BZEglu7+Gp3 x8qw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id; bh=pKTNmppQXURojlvS/ocqQLaESoRrkNPcmkIStHD3U4I=; fh=ZBfGsv2Ozl9icANPhv4WltWQaXbZH7dcwc2yMMGkgeM=; b=kFVoPgQAro6wpvDGPbZ7kG/qbvO9KXP3q+VkwJPNB+XVVrtkxLyZXwFp3WhMvS/vCp vUepGtSRWtDZ9paVpQQPWnop6j4HKM+W870WsYIX+RdHdtzPpytE6WRPq5RojMdeoLe0 UN+Nvk2r98JUc8T9N9QcUU6ify0z+ljH2LUdKOlaxCT23oXXhzAbgyMloJfyeTiLXgTx DZcjl0Z7UyTd5yLumO4LDOZTAEByPJ7E/SGtWBXCcCwabHuL1iUvFc7DJyyb9wTI5peK jceSuXof8ZstSB1W69VcdbEj34mWPaYpKwGG6FH+Nikmh/g/JpDNOiaXZarDnUcUFlYO 2akQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id s20-20020a656914000000b00557a2aa39d7si12581559pgq.31.2023.06.30.18.46.36; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:46:48 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229585AbjGABk2 (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:40:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33686 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229447AbjGABk1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2023 21:40:27 -0400 Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (unknown [45.249.212.51]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEAF73C3F; Fri, 30 Jun 2023 18:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.67.143]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QtFHm56mzz4f41xD; Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:40:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.174.179.247] (unknown [10.174.179.247]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgD3rLADhJ9kqHixMw--.61619S3; Sat, 01 Jul 2023 09:40:21 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <0af5c40f-ccc5-0d4c-3371-6473da9083b7@huaweicloud.com> Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2023 09:40:19 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.10.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] md/raid10: factor out get_rdev_repl_from_mirror() To: Song Liu , linan666@huaweicloud.com Cc: guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com, colyli@suse.de, xni@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yukuai3@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com References: <20230628015752.102267-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> <20230628015752.102267-3-linan666@huaweicloud.com> From: Li Nan In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgD3rLADhJ9kqHixMw--.61619S3 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoWrtryxKw4kWw1DAF4rZF15XFb_yoWDtrX_uw 4qyw1UGF15tr1kAr15Gr1YyFZxJFZxGaykZrZayrWfK3s7WFWj9ryrGryxA343C3yxXr9a kF1kGryYyrZ3ZjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUUb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbS8FF20E14v26r4j6ryUM7CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG 6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1j6r18M28lY4IEw2IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8w A2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Gr0_Xr1l84ACjcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Cr0_ Gr1UM28EF7xvwVC2z280aVAFwI0_GcCE3s1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s 0DM2vYz4IE04k24VAvwVAKI4IrM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l5I8CrVACY4xI 64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14v26r1j6r18McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWUJVW8Jw Am72CE4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lF7xvr2IY64vIr41lF7I21c0EjII2zVCS5cI20VAGYxC7 M4IIrI8v6xkF7I0E8cxan2IY04v7Mxk0xIA0c2IEe2xFo4CEbIxvr21l42xK82IYc2Ij64 vIr41l4I8I3I0E4IkC6x0Yz7v_Jr0_Gr1lx2IqxVAqx4xG67AKxVWUJVWUGwC20s026x8G jcxK67AKxVWUGVWUWwC2zVAF1VAY17CE14v26r1q6r43MIIYrxkI7VAKI48JMIIF0xvE2I x0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY6xkF7I0E14v26r4j6F4UMIIF0xvE42xK 8VAvwI8IcIk0rVWrZr1j6s0DMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7 CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x0JUQZ23UUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: polqt0awwwqx5xdzvxpfor3voofrz/ X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, MAY_BE_FORGED,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2023/7/1 7:53, Song Liu 写道: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2023 at 6:58 PM wrote: >> > [...] > >> >> +static void get_rdev_repl_from_mirror(struct raid10_info *mirror, >> + struct md_rdev **prdev, >> + struct md_rdev **prrdev) >> +{ >> + struct md_rdev *rdev, *rrdev; >> + >> + rrdev = rcu_dereference(mirror->replacement); >> + /* >> + * Read replacement first to prevent reading both rdev and >> + * replacement as NULL during replacement replace rdev. >> + */ >> + smp_mb(); >> + rdev = rcu_dereference(mirror->rdev); >> + if (rdev == rrdev) >> + rrdev = NULL; >> + >> + *prrdev = rrdev; >> + *prdev = rdev; > > I don't think the reduction in duplicated code justifies two output arguments. > > How about > > static struct md_rdev *dereference_rdev_and_rrdev(struct raid10_info *mirror, > struct md_rdev **prrdev) > { > ... > *prrdev = xxx; > return rdev; > } > > So we only have one argument for output. > > Also, "from_mirror" in the function name doesn't really add more value. > > Thanks, > Song > . I agree. Let me improve this. -- Thanks, Nan