Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <207f70b5-e017-33bc-bf46-206b3fb69a04@linaro.org>
Date:   Sat, 1 Jul 2023 10:01:42 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/exynos: fix a possible null-pointer dereference due
 to data race in exynos_drm_crtc_atomic_disable()
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>, inki.dae@samsung.com,
        sw0312.kim@samsung.com, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
        airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch, alim.akhtar@samsung.com
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        baijiaju1990@outlook.com, BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>
References: <20230630021906.1035115-1-islituo@gmail.com>
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230630021906.1035115-1-islituo@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 30/06/2023 04:19, Tuo Li wrote:
> The variable crtc->state->event is often protected by the lock 
> crtc->dev->event_lock when is accessed. However, it is accessed as a 
> condition of an if statement in exynos_drm_crtc_atomic_disable() without
> holding the lock:
> 
>   if (crtc->state->event && !crtc->state->active)
> 
> However, if crtc->state->event is changed to NULL by another thread right
> after the conditions of the if statement is checked to be true, a
> null-pointer dereference can occur in drm_crtc_send_vblank_event():
> 
>   e->pipe = pipe;
> 
> To fix this possible null-pointer dereference caused by data race, the 
> spin lock coverage is extended to protect the if statement as well as the 
> function call to drm_crtc_send_vblank_event().
> 
> Reported-by: BassCheck <bass@buaa.edu.cn>

I cannot find this report. This is an open source work and public
collaboration. The "Reported-by" usually means that the issue was
reported to us, in some way, usually in public. Can we see the report?
Otherwise adding non-public, non-verifiable reports is useless and
clutters our report-credit-system.

Best regards,
Krzysztof