Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
Cc:     xiaobo55x@gmail.com, haibo1.xu@intel.com, ajones@ventanamicro.com,
        maz@kernel.org, oliver.upton@linux.dev, seanjc@google.com,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
        Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
        Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
        Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>,
        Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
        David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
        Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH v5 08/13] KVM: arm64: selftests: Move reject_set check logic to a function
Date:   Sat,  1 Jul 2023 21:42:56 +0800
Message-Id: <f5ef26e862260efdf1c809d0eee46ee1c8b457f2.1688010022.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <cover.1688010022.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
References: <cover.1688010022.git.haibo1.xu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To:     unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Precedence: bulk

No functional changes. Just move the reject_set check logic to a
function so we can check for specific errno for specific register.
This is a preparation for support reject_set in riscv.

Suggested-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>
Signed-off-by: Haibo Xu <haibo1.xu@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c | 5 +++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c         | 7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
index aaf035c969ec..4aa58f1aebe3 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/aarch64/get-reg-list.c
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ bool filter_reg(__u64 reg)
 	return false;
 }
 
+bool check_reject_set(int err)
+{
+	return err == EPERM;
+}
+
 #define REG_MASK (KVM_REG_ARCH_MASK | KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK | KVM_REG_ARM_COPROC_MASK)
 
 #define CORE_REGS_XX_NR_WORDS	2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
index f6ad7991a812..79e198968860 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/get-reg-list.c
@@ -98,6 +98,11 @@ void __weak print_reg(const char *prefix, __u64 id)
 	printf("\t0x%llx,\n", id);
 }
 
+bool __weak check_reject_set(int err)
+{
+	return true;
+}
+
 #ifdef __aarch64__
 static void prepare_vcpu_init(struct vcpu_reg_list *c, struct kvm_vcpu_init *init)
 {
@@ -216,7 +221,7 @@ static void run_test(struct vcpu_reg_list *c)
 			if (s->rejects_set && find_reg(s->rejects_set, s->rejects_set_n, reg.id)) {
 				reject_reg = true;
 				ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_SET_ONE_REG, &reg);
-				if (ret != -1 || errno != EPERM) {
+				if (ret != -1 || !check_reject_set(errno)) {
 					printf("%s: Failed to reject (ret=%d, errno=%d) ", config_name(c), ret, errno);
 					print_reg(config_name(c), reg.id);
 					putchar('\n');
-- 
2.34.1