Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:56:21 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Crispin Cowan <crispin@crispincowan.com>,
       Thomas Fricaccia <thomas_fricacci@yahoo.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       LSM ML <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: LSM conversion to static interface
Message-ID: <20071022165621.GC29876@kroah.com>
References: <200710220224.l9M2Og5t020815@sapphire.spiritone.com> <20071022110718.3f781108@the-village.bc.nu> <471CCB77.3040004@crispincowan.com> <20071022175043.0aa65957@the-village.bc.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071022175043.0aa65957@the-village.bc.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 635
Lines: 17

On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 05:50:43PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> 
> For that reason I think keeping LSM is the right thing to do.

Wait, we aren't talking about dropping LSM at all, just the "LSM is a
module" option.  That's it.  And by making LSM not a module, we can then
go on to fix some of the reported speed issues that are present with the
LSM option enabled right now.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/