Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753317AbXJVR4q (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:56:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752101AbXJVR4k (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:56:40 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl ([195.241.79.177]:48813 "EHLO smtp-out2.tiscali.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751553AbXJVR4j (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:56:39 -0400 Message-ID: <471CE453.5050208@tiscali.nl> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:56:35 +0200 From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl> User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ray Lee CC: Rik van Riel , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug References: <471BF741.2020501@tiscali.nl> <20071021214209.1a7567d7@bree.surriel.com> <2c0942db0710220942he5e9199i2e327df3c5676a6a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <2c0942db0710220942he5e9199i2e327df3c5676a6a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 618 Lines: 14 Ray Lee wrote: > I'm sorry, perhaps I poured myself a cup of stupid this morning, but > isn't the above patch effectively introducing a BUG where none could > be reached before? In other words, for the patch to have zero > behavioral change, wouldn't it have to remove the BUG() altogether? True, but obviously not intended. I think the intention was to expose this bug. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/