Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp26172615rwd; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEKDB7yvqFaPxjxik2Bwi4eXuqWCi28JGuUNhpa9piCY/wUA3DEtqFZHOfB8DhwSmkPW+aG X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4c4:b0:1b8:2c6f:3247 with SMTP id o4-20020a170902d4c400b001b82c6f3247mr8943461plg.4.1688390702986; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 06:25:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688390702; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CIr9V+iGjvac8LsDeFUlh7Rfs+8YYDitfnnmUPCRl6b9oCeRwIOWyz/MmvxSSxY05H 7ha9z0TqnrU7P2n9q9JgRq+tPCvGk5Ot5z5j+xsZiZO/3cCzHbF1NhIXCx97qdGGjnfr XEB3XFPWZI4rtZxcWtWFe/bblZnp1sSn8wqa9Z+VK1WHn4aDUSeLBqNrKAa/0wyLlD5J cVw+K0VsYhpmkk8BX/L+bmOKe0cSIAtkrT3120LkxsW/f0x4+0lpiKEm2G2lxPmYgLHo l8T1H3RlQpCKoaoursv2i4sSlrN0C6Uwt3j6t+9+6mcFJpgnfbuPCm6HJ6mMGBoT1wUk WAsg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id; bh=9gqpZcBq7fy6j3067HBmM9J5VOfhaqHQWM/WNI6ntEs=; fh=UUD8G6FKTNzSHzFnzIXpEV/j9pvnsfdf2BmHZXLcFo0=; b=k+aI7Sm5pGaqmRKbZiYTAmTOljtdUrtWv4qU0izZ/tFtz/WSjMUTTQobSOW/Jj5uTt wqIa++o9e59PvWuCwblD8NE0JC6TjZZ6MuL2lI+XJ55t6nr96eRpyf4bMHYbZ8KGZ6s8 lJvm31o9umGJok0ZXSC5TrNXtz2y0m+Y7e4q6QDdRjGqxO6o6nIvwWi18gbTz191l3Ic NTED5prrLo3zZhVgGnAggejnKmh/Ejm37MY5KEjhlYL6N0orDchF7PrZFUnyKuYYU0vd 8cLCxZBblpx1+lsvqv59khTT08kCcLfqkHxziVMT4NxKkpIa2CYAiaXYmKKm2aK9jLx1 47+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i8-20020a17090332c800b001ac62935789si12386770plr.468.2023.07.03.06.24.48; Mon, 03 Jul 2023 06:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=QUARANTINE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230371AbjGCNHX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:07:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40000 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230452AbjGCNHW (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:07:22 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com (szxga03-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.189]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 966DF94; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 06:07:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4QvmNx0gbvzLnfN; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:05:05 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.108.26] (10.67.108.26) by dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2507.27; Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:07:15 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:07:15 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v6 0/2] support allocating crashkernel above 4G explicitly on riscv Content-Language: en-US To: Guo Ren CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , References: <20230701171138.1491206-1-chenjiahao16@huawei.com> From: "chenjiahao (C)" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.108.26] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggpemm500016.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.25) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/7/1 21:45, Guo Ren wrote: > On Sat, Jul 1, 2023 at 5:12 PM Chen Jiahao wrote: >> On riscv, the current crash kernel allocation logic is trying to >> allocate within 32bit addressible memory region by default, if >> failed, try to allocate without 4G restriction. >> >> In need of saving DMA zone memory while allocating a relatively large >> crash kernel region, allocating the reserved memory top down in >> high memory, without overlapping the DMA zone, is a mature solution. >> Hence this patchset introduces the parameter option crashkernel=X,[high,low]. >> >> One can reserve the crash kernel from high memory above DMA zone range >> by explicitly passing "crashkernel=X,high"; or reserve a memory range >> below 4G with "crashkernel=X,low". Besides, there are few rules need >> to take notice: >> 1. "crashkernel=X,[high,low]" will be ignored if "crashkernel=size" >> is specified. >> 2. "crashkernel=X,low" is valid only when "crashkernel=X,high" is passed >> and there is enough memory to be allocated under 4G. >> 3. When allocating crashkernel above 4G and no "crashkernel=X,low" is >> specified, a 128M low memory will be allocated automatically for >> swiotlb bounce buffer. >> See Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt for more information. >> >> To verify loading the crashkernel, adapted kexec-tools is attached below: >> https://github.com/chenjh005/kexec-tools/tree/build-test-riscv-v2 >> >> Following test cases have been performed as expected: >> 1) crashkernel=256M //low=256M >> 2) crashkernel=1G //low=1G > Have you tried 1GB memory? we found a pud mapping problem on Sv39 of kexec, See: > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230629082032.3481237-1-guoren@kernel.org/ I have tested on QEMU with sv57 mmu, so it seems the synchronization problem was not reproduce when reserving 1G memory and loading the capture kernel. Thanks, Jiahao > >> 3) crashkernel=4G //high=4G, low=128M(default) >> 4) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,high //high=4G, low=128M(default), high is ignored >> 5) crashkernel=4G crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=128M(default), low is ignored >> 6) crashkernel=4G,high //high=4G, low=128M(default) >> 7) crashkernel=256M,low //low=0M, invalid >> 8) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=256M,low //high=4G, low=256M >> 9) crashkernel=4G,high crashkernel=4G,low //high=0M, low=0M, invalid >> 10) crashkernel=512M@0xd0000000 //low=512M >> >> Changes since [v6]: >> 1. Introduce the "high" flag to mark whether "crashkernel=X,high" >> is passed. Fix the retrying logic between "crashkernel=X,high" >> case and others when the first allocation attempt fails. >> >> Changes since [v5]: >> 1. Update the crashkernel allocation logic when crashkernel=X,high >> is specified. In this case, region above 4G will directly get >> reserved as crashkernel, rather than trying lower 32bit allocation >> first. >> >> Changes since [v4]: >> 1. Update some imprecise code comments for cmdline parsing. >> >> Changes since [v3]: >> 1. Update to print warning and return explicitly on failure when >> crashkernel=size@offset is specified. Not changing the result >> in this case but making the logic more straightforward. >> 2. Some minor cleanup. >> >> Changes since [v2]: >> 1. Update the allocation logic to ensure the high crashkernel >> region is reserved strictly above dma32_phys_limit. >> 2. Clean up some minor format problems. >> >> Chen Jiahao (2): >> riscv: kdump: Implement crashkernel=X,[high,low] >> docs: kdump: Update the crashkernel description for riscv >> >> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 15 ++-- >> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c | 5 ++ >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++-- >> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.34.1 >> >