Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] blk-mq: improve tag fair sharing
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
        Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
References: <20230618160738.54385-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
 <4c9fea33-9c30-4ab9-c210-95e09d323837@acm.org>
From:   Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
Message-ID: <82d44ba1-4389-079c-935a-cbb49203ca27@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 21:29:08 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4c9fea33-9c30-4ab9-c210-95e09d323837@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi, Christoph and Jens and anyone who's interested

在 2023/06/20 23:20, Bart Van Assche 写道:
> On 6/18/23 09:07, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> This is not a formal version and not fully tested, I send this RFC
>> because I want to make sure if people think doing this is meaningful,
>> before I spend too much time on this.
> The approach looks good to me but I'd like to hear from Jens and 
> Christoph what their opinion is about the approach of this patch series 
> before doing an in-depth review.
> 
Any suggestions on this topic? It'll be great to hear that if anyone
thinks it's meaningful to refactor tag fair sharing.

Thanks,
Kuai
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> .
>