Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:09:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:09:04 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:42130 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:08:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:08:09 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20011218.130809.22018359.davem@redhat.com> To: acme@conectiva.com.br Cc: SteveW@ACM.org, jschlst@samba.org, ncorbic@sangoma.com, eis@baty.hanse.de, dag@brattli.net, torvalds@transmeta.com, marcelo@conectiva.com.br, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC 2] cleaning up struct sock From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20011218185200.A1211@conectiva.com.br> In-Reply-To: <20011218033552.B910@conectiva.com.br> <20011217.225134.91313099.davem@redhat.com> <20011218185200.A1211@conectiva.com.br> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 18:52:00 -0200 Em Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 10:51:34PM -0800, David S. Miller escreveu: > Which brings me to... > > Please let me know if this is something acceptable for 2.5. > > What kind of before/after effect do you see in lat_tcp/lat_connect > (from lmbench) runs? Improvements on the lat_connect case? :) Great. I have no fundamental problems with your changes. Now, when/if we move the hash-chain/identity members into the IPv4 struct (there are some issues with this wrt. ipv6 btw) I will be interested in seeing the same tests done :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/