Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <c4de836a-a2a1-847f-1525-1accb814e45e@acm.org>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 11:08:13 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.12.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/7] blk-mq: improve tag fair sharing
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Yu Kuai <yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>, axboe@kernel.dk
Cc:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@huawei.com>
References: <20230618160738.54385-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com>
 <4c9fea33-9c30-4ab9-c210-95e09d323837@acm.org>
 <82d44ba1-4389-079c-935a-cbb49203ca27@huaweicloud.com>
From:   Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
In-Reply-To: <82d44ba1-4389-079c-935a-cbb49203ca27@huaweicloud.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 7/3/23 06:29, Yu Kuai wrote:
> 在 2023/06/20 23:20, Bart Van Assche 写道:
>> On 6/18/23 09:07, Yu Kuai wrote:
>>> This is not a formal version and not fully tested, I send this RFC
>>> because I want to make sure if people think doing this is meaningful,
>>> before I spend too much time on this.
>> The approach looks good to me but I'd like to hear from Jens and 
>> Christoph what their opinion is about the approach of this patch 
>> series before doing an in-depth review.
>>
> Any suggestions on this topic? It'll be great to hear that if anyone
> thinks it's meaningful to refactor tag fair sharing.

The cover letter of this patch series says "This is not a formal version 
and not fully tested". If a fully tested version will be posted, I will 
help with an in-depth review.

Thanks,

Bart.