Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753183AbXJVXA2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:00:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751715AbXJVXAU (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:00:20 -0400 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.248]:27587 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751712AbXJVXAS (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:00:18 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=pplMcv1R0f1f4jKihV+OXxLkb89tA9EXPsJ62SBMu4Q7zACVHert9+IdsLQtTTZR7G6/mA2pgLonkPP5MSyA4crLpC2uueQyZ2FAIop3jR7aD8sjRyI2fPBjM0CbomsncSUen/7tqquPzejzTSbvRxIPqv0fWEvs6ICaX5dxpOs= Message-ID: <2c0942db0710221600j24f76f68lefe562cc8bc2d067@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 16:00:16 -0700 From: "Ray Lee" To: "Rene Herman" Subject: Re: [PATCH] return hidden bug Cc: "Roel Kluin" <12o3l@tiscali.nl>, "Rik van Riel" , lkml In-Reply-To: <471D23AA.2000803@keyaccess.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <471BF741.2020501@tiscali.nl> <20071021214209.1a7567d7@bree.surriel.com> <2c0942db0710220942he5e9199i2e327df3c5676a6a@mail.gmail.com> <471CE453.5050208@tiscali.nl> <2c0942db0710221112g7c7d99caj7feb0c2ac5de17e7@mail.gmail.com> <471CF150.9090707@tiscali.nl> <471D23AA.2000803@keyaccess.nl> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3a2bf1150f99e939 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 912 Lines: 21 On 10/22/07, Rene Herman wrote: > Hugely trust inspiring isn't it -- the amount of eyes and comments you'll > get even on trivial patches like this? This development model is working! Go easy with the snarkiness, hmm? It's the trivial ones that seem to be the most dangerous. The larger ones actually get *tested* sometimes. > Now if only we'd sometimes get some for non trivial patches as well... That's certainly true regardless, but for myself, I'd rather throw some reviews out for the small ones since I have adequate time and knowledge for them. The larger ones require domain specific knowledge I lack, and time I don't have. ~r. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/