Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230703135330.1865927-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com>
 <20230703135330.1865927-4-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <ac6802f6-01a2-6b39-38c7-2fe3cea75dde@intel.com>
 <CAOUHufbmv0pZ1h9AxBj-SD7OqRZYudHMtXzQxcwD4ky-sFd8kg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOUHufbpCU_Z7g1QPJ0+HzE9sdNpSh=Mzi0EByLPu5TE4S_UcQ@mail.gmail.com> <4f86fa34-11d0-8a11-5adf-d099fc9e46b8@intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <4f86fa34-11d0-8a11-5adf-d099fc9e46b8@intel.com>
From:   Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jul 2023 23:42:10 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOUHufaC6bZv+U8hLvF9sR2O7tRW+Bzf0BjrFg9OOUpkm6hQQA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: Default implementation of arch_wants_pte_order()
To:     "Yin, Fengwei" <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
Cc:     Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@kvack.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 11:23=E2=80=AFPM Yin, Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com=
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/4/2023 11:59 AM, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 9:02=E2=80=AFPM Yu Zhao <yuzhao@google.com> wrot=
e:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 8:23=E2=80=AFPM Yin, Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel=
.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 7/3/2023 9:53 PM, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> >>>> arch_wants_pte_order() can be overridden by the arch to return the
> >>>> preferred folio order for pte-mapped memory. This is useful as some
> >>>> architectures (e.g. arm64) can coalesce TLB entries when the physica=
l
> >>>> memory is suitably contiguous.
> >>>>
> >>>> The first user for this hint will be FLEXIBLE_THP, which aims to
> >>>> allocate large folios for anonymous memory to reduce page faults and
> >>>> other per-page operation costs.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here we add the default implementation of the function, used when th=
e
> >>>> architecture does not define it, which returns the order correspondi=
ng
> >>>> to 64K.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>  include/linux/pgtable.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> >>>>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pgtable.h b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> >>>> index a661a17173fa..f7e38598f20b 100644
> >>>> --- a/include/linux/pgtable.h
> >>>> +++ b/include/linux/pgtable.h
> >>>> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >>>>  #include <linux/errno.h>
> >>>>  #include <asm-generic/pgtable_uffd.h>
> >>>>  #include <linux/page_table_check.h>
> >>>> +#include <linux/sizes.h>
> >>>>
> >>>>  #if 5 - defined(__PAGETABLE_P4D_FOLDED) - defined(__PAGETABLE_PUD_F=
OLDED) - \
> >>>>       defined(__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED) !=3D CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS
> >>>> @@ -336,6 +337,18 @@ static inline bool arch_has_hw_pte_young(void)
> >>>>  }
> >>>>  #endif
> >>>>
> >>>> +#ifndef arch_wants_pte_order
> >>>> +/*
> >>>> + * Returns preferred folio order for pte-mapped memory. Must be in =
range [0,
> >>>> + * PMD_SHIFT-PAGE_SHIFT) and must not be order-1 since THP requires=
 large folios
> >>>> + * to be at least order-2.
> >>>> + */
> >>>> +static inline int arch_wants_pte_order(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> +     return ilog2(SZ_64K >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >>> Default value which is not related with any silicon may be: PAGE_ALLO=
C_COSTLY_ORDER?
> >>>
> >>> Also, current pcp list support cache page with order 0...PAGE_ALLOC_C=
OSTLY_ORDER, 9.
> >>> If the pcp could cover the page, the pressure to zone lock will be re=
duced by pcp.
> >>
> >> The value of PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER is reasonable but again it's a
> >> s/w policy not a h/w preference. Besides, I don't think we can include
> >> mmzone.h in pgtable.h.
> >
> > I think we can make a compromise:
> > 1. change the default implementation of arch_has_hw_pte_young() to retu=
rn 0, and
> > 2. in memory.c, we can try PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER for archs that
> > don't override arch_has_hw_pte_young(), or if its return value is too
> > large to fit.
> Do you mean arch_wants_pte_order()? Yes. This looks good to me. Thanks.

Sorry, copied the wrong function from above and pasted without looking...