Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:20:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:19:29 -0500 Received: from perninha.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.156]:49681 "HELO perninha.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:18:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 19:18:24 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Larry McVoy Cc: Alan Cox , Linus Torvalds , Benjamin LaHaise , Davide Libenzi , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Scheduler ( was: Just a second ) ... In-Reply-To: <20011218130228.N26374@work.bitmover.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Dec 2001, Larry McVoy wrote: > Maybe I'm an old stick in the mud, but IRC seems like a big waste of > time to me. It's perfect for off the cuff answers and fairly useless > for thoughtful answers. We used to write well thought out papers and > specifications for OS work. These days if you can't do it in a > paragraph on IRC it must not be worth doing, eh? Actually, we tend to use multiple media at the same time. It happens very often that because of some discussion on IRC we end up writing up a few paragraphs and sending it to people by email. For other things, email is clearly too slow, so stuff is done on IRC (eg. walking somebody through a piece of code to identify and agree on a bug). cheers, Rik -- DMCA, SSSCA, W3C? Who cares? http://thefreeworld.net/ http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/