Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <4ac98180-3fdc-24e4-1d46-0ed567da5448@loongson.cn>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2023 02:14:10 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: drm/drm_gem.c: Remove surplus else after return
From:   Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
References: <20230622101857.2298773-1-suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <20230622101857.2298773-1-suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,  Thomas


On 2023/6/22 18:18, Sui Jingfeng wrote:
> else is not generally useful after return
>
> Signed-off-by: Sui Jingfeng <suijingfeng@loongson.cn>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> index 1a5a2cd0d4ec..c18686f434d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem.c
> @@ -1150,8 +1150,8 @@ int drm_gem_pin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
>   {
>   	if (obj->funcs->pin)
>   		return obj->funcs->pin(obj);
> -	else
> -		return 0;
> +
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   void drm_gem_unpin(struct drm_gem_object *obj)


I have merge this patch with the dim tool, by using the following command,


  ./dim push-branch drm-misc-next


Is this looks fine?

I'm so worry about the dim tool now.

I want to make sure if I do the things correctly.