Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/2] BPF kselftest cross-build/RISC-V fixes
To:     =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@kernel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
        Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     =?UTF-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@rivosinc.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
References: <20230705113926.751791-1-bjorn@kernel.org>
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Message-ID: <9ee053a4-500c-2722-d822-d137648e55e5@iogearbox.net>
Date:   Wed, 5 Jul 2023 14:38:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20230705113926.751791-1-bjorn@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 7/5/23 1:39 PM, Björn Töpel wrote:
> From: Björn Töpel <bjorn@rivosinc.com>
> 
> This series has two minor fixes, found when cross-compiling for the
> RISC-V architecture.
> 
> Some RISC-V systems do not define HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
> which made some of tests bail out. Fix the failing tests by adding
> F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS.
> 
> ...and some RISC-V systems *do* define
> HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. In this case the autoconf.h was not
> correctly picked up by the build system.

Looks good, applied thanks! Any plans on working towards integrating riscv
into upstream BPF CI? Would love to see that happening. :)

Thanks,
Daniel