Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:37:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:36:16 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:7315 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Dec 2001 16:34:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 13:33:38 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20011218.133338.122061979.davem@redhat.com> To: riel@conectiva.com.br Cc: rmk@arm.linux.org.uk, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, Mika.Liljeberg@welho.com, Mika.Liljeberg@nokia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sarolaht@cs.helsinki.fi Subject: Re: ARM: Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2 [NEW DATA] From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <20011218.131155.91757544.davem@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Rik van Riel Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 19:24:41 -0200 (BRST) Then the problem will have to be fixed elsewhere, maybe by having the networking code do explicit unaligned accesses through some macro which defaults to a normal access on other systems ? It is a port requirement to fix up such accesses. It has always been a port requirement to fix up such accesses, and it isn't going to change. If I fix up TCP options, I'd have to fixup every access to every single networking header in the entire stack because "protocol in protocol" cases can cause unaligned accesses to happen just about any place. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/