Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date:   Thu, 06 Jul 2023 09:26:05 +0200
From:   Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
To:     Mamta Shukla <mamta.shukla@leica-geosystems.com>
Cc:     Mamta Shukla <mamta.shukla@leica-geosystems.com>,
        tudor.ambarus@linaro.org, pratyush@kernel.org,
        miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com,
        linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: micron-st: enable lock/unlock for mt25qu512a
In-Reply-To: <419d80f252f12f091b9c555da0965c84@walle.cc>
References: <20230705130010.2999839-1-mamta.shukla@leica-geosystems.com>
 <419d80f252f12f091b9c555da0965c84@walle.cc>
Message-ID: <582915cc4adc89b8ce16568f4d0421ca@walle.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Am 2023-07-05 15:22, schrieb Michael Walle:

> FWIW, I noticed the difference between MT25QU and MT25QL here. But
> I don't think we can do anything about it. It is just another example,
> that the name is mostly irrelavant/cannot be trusted. Vendors tend to
> reuse the id for different (software compatible probably) parts. Maybe
> we can get rid of it entirely. Tudor, Pratyush?

I must have been blind, the ID is different (ba vs bb), but my point
is still valid.

-michael