Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <2ca3892e-a018-37e1-5a3d-288e6af2ec4d@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 6 Jul 2023 10:18:40 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IOWbnuWkjTog5Zue5aSNOiBbUEFUQ0hdIGZpcm13YXJlOiBzdHJh?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?tix10-svc=3a_Fix_an_NULL_vs_IS=5fERR=28=29_bug_in_svc=5fcreate=5f?=
 =?UTF-8?Q?memory=5fpool=28=29?=
Content-Language: en-US
To:     =?UTF-8?B?546L5piOLei9r+S7tuW6leWxguaKgOacr+mDqA==?= 
        <machel@vivo.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "opensource.kernel" <opensource.kernel@vivo.com>
References: <20230704082706.1721-1-machel@vivo.com>
 <fe780326-2150-a3e6-e451-ea82be65e0cf@web.de>
 <daa12e00-1d01-45d0-89c8-03ff94fa3399@kadam.mountain>
 <SG2PR06MB3743AC289C8C124CA57C77DABD2CA@SG2PR06MB3743.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
 <fe812000-c5bf-4510-a3a9-76684a59ecc9@kadam.mountain>
 <SG2PR06MB3743DD3C50017612CF3BE38ABD2CA@SG2PR06MB3743.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
From:   Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <SG2PR06MB3743DD3C50017612CF3BE38ABD2CA@SG2PR06MB3743.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 7/6/23 03:56, 王明-软件底层技术部 wrote:
> I see. Thank you
> 
> -----邮件原件-----
> 发件人: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
> 发送时间: 2023年7月6日 16:52
> 收件人: 王明-软件底层技术部 <machel@vivo.com>
> 抄送: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>; LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; opensource.kernel <opensource.kernel@vivo.com>
> 主题: Re: 回复: [PATCH] firmware: stratix10-svc: Fix an NULL vs IS_ERR() bug in svc_create_memory_pool()
> 
> On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 08:44:39AM +0000, 王明-软件底层技术部 wrote:
>> Thank you Dan carpenter.
>> This patch has been submitted for a long time, but I have not heard
>> back from the maintainer, and I am confused whether I need to send it
>> again

Looks like you sent an original patch on July 1st, then you sent another 
patch on July 4th. In the future, please take Dan's advice on 2 weeks 
and if you do need to resend you can add a 'RESEND' to the subject line, 
or just reply with a ping to the original patch. I was on a short leave. 
I'll take your patch next week with the edits from Dan's comments.

Thanks,
Dinh