Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   =?UTF-8?q?N=C3=ADcolas=20F=2E=20R=2E=20A=2E=20Prado?= 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc:     kernel@collabora.com,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
        =?UTF-8?q?Bernhard=20Rosenkr=C3=A4nzer?= <bero@baylibre.com>,
        =?UTF-8?q?N=C3=ADcolas=20F=2E=20R=2E=20A=2E=20Prado?= 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>, Amit Kucheria <amitk@kernel.org>,
        Balsam CHIHI <bchihi@baylibre.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] thermal/drivers/mediatek/lvts_thermal: Make readings valid in filtered mode
Date:   Thu,  6 Jul 2023 12:14:33 -0400
Message-ID: <20230706161509.204546-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

Currently, when a controller is configured to use filtered mode, thermal
readings are valid only about 30% of the time.

Upon testing, it was noticed that lowering any of the interval settings
resulted in an improved rate of valid data. The same was observed when
decreasing the number of samples for each sensor (which also results in
quicker measurements).

Retrying the read with a timeout longer than the time it takes to
resample (about 344us with these settings and 4 sensors) also improves
the rate.

Lower all timing settings to the minimum, configure the filtering to
single sample, and poll the measurement register for at least one period
to improve the data validity on filtered mode.  With these changes in
place, out of 100000 reads, a single one failed, ie 99.999% of the data
was valid.

Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com>

---

 drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
index 1e11defe4f35..b5fb1d8bc3d8 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/mediatek/lvts_thermal.c
@@ -58,11 +58,11 @@
 #define LVTS_PROTTC(__base)		(__base + 0x00CC)
 #define LVTS_CLKEN(__base)		(__base + 0x00E4)
 
-#define LVTS_PERIOD_UNIT			((118 * 1000) / (256 * 38))
-#define LVTS_GROUP_INTERVAL			1
-#define LVTS_FILTER_INTERVAL		1
-#define LVTS_SENSOR_INTERVAL		1
-#define LVTS_HW_FILTER				0x2
+#define LVTS_PERIOD_UNIT			0
+#define LVTS_GROUP_INTERVAL			0
+#define LVTS_FILTER_INTERVAL		0
+#define LVTS_SENSOR_INTERVAL		0
+#define LVTS_HW_FILTER				0x0
 #define LVTS_TSSEL_CONF				0x13121110
 #define LVTS_CALSCALE_CONF			0x300
 #define LVTS_MONINT_CONF			0x9FBF7BDE
@@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
 	struct lvts_sensor *lvts_sensor = thermal_zone_device_priv(tz);
 	void __iomem *msr = lvts_sensor->msr;
 	u32 value;
+	int rc;
 
 	/*
 	 * Measurement registers:
@@ -269,7 +270,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
 	 * 16	: Valid temperature
 	 * 15-0	: Raw temperature
 	 */
-	value = readl(msr);
+	rc = readl_poll_timeout(msr, value, value & BIT(16), 240, 400);
 
 	/*
 	 * As the thermal zone temperature will read before the
@@ -282,7 +283,7 @@ static int lvts_get_temp(struct thermal_zone_device *tz, int *temp)
 	 * functionning temperature and directly jump to a system
 	 * shutdown.
 	 */
-	if (!(value & BIT(16)))
+	if (rc)
 		return -EAGAIN;
 
 	*temp = lvts_raw_to_temp(value & 0xFFFF);
-- 
2.41.0