Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230602161246.1855448-1-amit.pundir@linaro.org>
 <358c69ad-fa8a-7386-fe75-92369883ee48@leemhuis.info> <0f6c9dcb-b7f6-fff9-6bed-f4585ea8e487@linaro.org>
 <CAD=FV=Xt2KYGY15+f+nHxkzKnwhHzw1A7=o+5kgCDWvHDv0DNg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20230620155902.clspxncyvpodixft@ripper> <5240ce3f-37fa-2747-92ee-23d71619f3ef@leemhuis.info>
 <CAMi1Hd2zunc=WNUE7KT-423RXTiX6LrY2hcWQdV3Dp3o8RdJtg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMi1Hd2zunc=WNUE7KT-423RXTiX6LrY2hcWQdV3Dp3o8RdJtg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:38:31 +0530
Message-ID: <CAMi1Hd2L-j9GHQH+4O6j6m2+HGy5oEsdMv6Qyp4RaWZDNCj-Bw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: qcom: sdm845-db845c: Move LVS regulator nodes up
To:     Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@lists.linux.dev>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@linaro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        dt <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 17:18, Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 22 Jun 2023 at 13:17, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten
> Leemhuis) <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Thorsten here, the Linux kernel's regression tracker. Top-posting
> > for once, to make this easily accessible to everyone.
> >
> > As Linus will likely release 6.4 on this or the following Sunday a quick
> > status inquiry so I can brief him appropriately: is there any hope the
> > regression this patch tried to fix will be resolved any time soon?
>
> We are most likely to miss v6.4. I'm trying to reproduce the crash
> with tracing enabled, to share some more debug information.

FWIW, I couldn't reproduce this bug on v6.5 merge window commit
d528014517f2 (Revert ".gitignore: ignore *.cover and *.mbx")
on 100+ boot tests last night.
For the time being I'm keeping an eye on it and will trigger the boot
tests occasionally in the v6.5 development cycle.

>
> Regards,
> Amit Pundir
>