Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752761AbXJWUdY (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:33:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751862AbXJWUdR (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:33:17 -0400 Received: from 81-174-11-161.static.ngi.it ([81.174.11.161]:43986 "EHLO mail.enneenne.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751564AbXJWUdQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:33:16 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:35:48 +0200 From: Rodolfo Giometti To: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse Message-ID: <20071023203547.GO9748@enneenne.com> References: <20071023180417.GM9748@enneenne.com> <20071023201750.GE7793@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071023201750.GE7793@redhat.com> Organization: GNU/Linux Device Drivers, Embedded Systems and Courses X-PGP-Key: gpg --keyserver keyserver.linux.it --recv-keys D25A5633 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-11) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.32.1 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: giometti@enneenne.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] LinuxPPS - PPS support for Linux X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Tue, 09 Jan 2007 17:23:22 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on mail.enneenne.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2307 Lines: 74 On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:17:50PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote: > On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 08:04:18PM +0200, Rodolfo Giometti wrote: > > Hi Rodolfo, Hi! :) > > here my last patch for PPS support. > > > > Please, let me know if I have something to do for kernel inclusion. > > Thanks for trying to get this merged, we've had a few users asking > us to support this in the Fedora kernel. This sounds good! ;) > >From a quick look through, it doesn't look too bad. > A couple of obvious things that jumped out.. > > * The example program in the Documentation dir. > There was some discussion recently about moving away > from doing this, and instead moving code to the samples/ dir > (or including it in util-linux instead if applicable). Mmm, I just consider them as simple userland examples. They don't need to manage PPS devices. I can remove them from Documentation/pps/, no problems, but in my modest opinion they are just documentation. :) > > + static struct pps_source_info_s pps_ktimer_info = { > > + name : "ktimer", > > + path : "", > > + mode : PPS_CAPTUREASSERT | PPS_OFFSETASSERT | \ > > + PPS_ECHOASSERT | \ > > + PPS_CANWAIT | PPS_TSFMT_TSPEC, > > + echo : pps_ktimer_echo, > > + owner : THIS_MODULE, > > + }; > > should be > .name = "ktimer" > etc.. Fixed. > > +#include > > This should be getting included automatically for you. Fixed. > On the whole, asides from these (very) minor nits, quite a clean > submission compared to a lot of new driver submissions to lkml. > Might want to run it through scripts/checkpatch.pl too to see > if that picks up any more minor fluff. Ok! Ciao, Rodolfo -- GNU/Linux Solutions e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com Linux Device Driver giometti@gnudd.com Embedded Systems giometti@linux.it UNIX programming phone: +39 349 2432127 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/