Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230610075738.3273764-2-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>
 <1c8c612d99e202a61e6a6ecf50d4cace.paul@paul-moore.com> <8fd08063bc6b4325b9785052d02da9f2@huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <8fd08063bc6b4325b9785052d02da9f2@huawei.com>
From:   Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
Date:   Fri, 7 Jul 2023 10:34:58 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQGWWQgA9DBpq+q4XQerbN0SXAB8RG94G8uMD0-J968xA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 1/4] security: Allow all LSMs to provide xattrs for
 inode_init_security hook
To:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Cc:     Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com>,
        "zohar@linux.ibm.com" <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        "dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com" <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
        "jmorris@namei.org" <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "serge@hallyn.com" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        "stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com" <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
        "eparis@parisplace.org" <eparis@parisplace.org>,
        "casey@schaufler-ca.com" <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" 
        <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
        "selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
        "bpf@vger.kernel.org" <bpf@vger.kernel.org>,
        "kpsingh@kernel.org" <kpsingh@kernel.org>,
        "keescook@chromium.org" <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org" <nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 2:49=E2=80=AFAM Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.=
com> wrote:
> > From: Paul Moore [mailto:paul@paul-moore.com]
> > Sent: Friday, July 7, 2023 3:44 AM
> > On Jun 10, 2023 Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Currently, the LSM infrastructure supports only one LSM providing an =
xattr
> > > and EVM calculating the HMAC on that xattr, plus other inode metadata=
.
> > >
> > > Allow all LSMs to provide one or multiple xattrs, by extending the se=
curity
> > > blob reservation mechanism. Introduce the new lbs_xattr_count field o=
f the
> > > lsm_blob_sizes structure, so that each LSM can specify how many xattr=
s it
> > > needs, and the LSM infrastructure knows how many xattr slots it shoul=
d
> > > allocate.
> > >
> > > Modify the inode_init_security hook definition, by passing the full
> > > xattr array allocated in security_inode_init_security(), and the curr=
ent
> > > number of xattr slots in that array filled by LSMs. The first paramet=
er
> > > would allow EVM to access and calculate the HMAC on xattrs supplied b=
y
> > > other LSMs, the second to not leave gaps in the xattr array, when an =
LSM
> > > requested but did not provide xattrs (e.g. if it is not initialized).
> > >
> > > Introduce lsm_get_xattr_slot(), which LSMs can call as many times as =
the
> > > number specified in the lbs_xattr_count field of the lsm_blob_sizes
> > > structure. During each call, lsm_get_xattr_slot() increments the numb=
er of
> > > filled xattrs, so that at the next invocation it returns the next xat=
tr
> > > slot to fill.
> > >
> > > Cleanup security_inode_init_security(). Unify the !initxattrs and
> > > initxattrs case by simply not allocating the new_xattrs array in the
> > > former. Update the documentation to reflect the changes, and fix the
> > > description of the xattr name, as it is not allocated anymore.
> > >
> > > Adapt both SELinux and Smack to use the new definition of the
> > > inode_init_security hook, and to call lsm_get_xattr_slot() to obtain =
and
> > > fill the reserved slots in the xattr array.
> > >
> > > Move the xattr->name assignment after the xattr->value one, so that i=
t is
> > > done only in case of successful memory allocation.
> > >
> > > Finally, change the default return value of the inode_init_security h=
ook
> > > from zero to -EOPNOTSUPP, so that BPF LSM correctly follows the hook
> > > conventions.
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Nicolas Bouchinet <nicolas.bouchinet@clip-os.org>
> > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/Y1FTSIo+1x+4X0LS@archli=
nux/
> > > Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/lsm_hook_defs.h |  6 +--
> > >  include/linux/lsm_hooks.h     | 20 ++++++++++
> > >  security/security.c           | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------=
--
> > >  security/selinux/hooks.c      | 17 +++++----
> > >  security/smack/smack_lsm.c    | 25 ++++++------
> > >  5 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
> >
> > Two *very* small suggestions below, but I can make those during the
> > merge if you are okay with that Roberto?
>
> Hi Paul
>
> yes, sure, I'm ok with them. Please make them during the merge.

Great, I'll queue this up for merging once the merge window closes.
I'll send confirmation once it's done but just a heads-up that things
might be a little delayed next week.

--=20
paul-moore.com