Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>
Cc:     linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>,
        Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
        Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>,
        WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
        Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
        Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, loongarch@lists.linux.dev,
        linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] vgacon: rework screen_info #ifdef checks
In-Reply-To: <ff9bfcfa-fa3b-42d2-b429-059b5103bce2@app.fastmail.com>
References: <20230707095415.1449376-1-arnd@kernel.org>
 <20230707095415.1449376-2-arnd@kernel.org>
 <87jzvbyh4p.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
 <ff9bfcfa-fa3b-42d2-b429-059b5103bce2@app.fastmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 07 Jul 2023 17:27:03 +0200
Message-ID: <87bkgnyc6w.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de> writes:

> On Fri, Jul 7, 2023, at 15:40, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:

[...]

>> And this is only used by mdacon (not supported by ia64), vgacon and
>> vga16fb (not supported by ia64 either).
>>
>> So this could just be guarded just by CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE for ia64 ?
>
> Right, I though about doing this more accurately, but in the end
> went for the simplest change rather than spending much more time
> trying to clean up the unused variables etc.
>
> Let me know if you'd prefer me to respin this part, otherwise
> I'd call the ia64 bit good enough for the purpose of the series.
>

No need to re-spin, agreed that makes sense to keep it simpler.

-- 
Best regards,

Javier Martinez Canillas
Core Platforms
Red Hat