Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp34003451rwd; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 03:07:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEerzqrGxH9cTxKyKi9rTubdRB+9XuB/CITQpOCYSMg4lgh/e2ZmwlGkxbVRmwGHPgIs7Ti X-Received: by 2002:ac2:58f6:0:b0:4f8:5792:3802 with SMTP id v22-20020ac258f6000000b004f857923802mr7069792lfo.10.1688897258401; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:07:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688897258; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=Z9xqCaGPBXU0EA5W9ivesdbKiipMPCObhTiqlIIieo8bPflDoZgiIb5zPWZcKVCRoI 4TLiRe6bsjuQ50vBbMvOfR/jFDe2/PABEqiqxOAnpUNi7DFAz3zNb/MDJcw1O3/ConFW pyUucHC31aCs8bHTcaczEUWORDCBafCscY9d6oTFiEc0vT0a8bWBIyl7zvmsx5HsaL2s A0dNC6t+PTKCIue+RdR+yIzr5sOkqPc12K6GzsVCSv3BHf4d/UIqc3nOJWp8OvmmDRL2 VPGj7Gv64A+kHQFv9vGHuMQgO4L5YL6KJyFFjHtibbst/zrybamHfaRRn/MiiZsLA/f5 NXsA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=SOHQs6Y5tApLDJDIXK3yAo24c3+L+Fo2dWRseVRFVVo=; fh=tcl19X2u8PtEELiqC9wF/fi8DNcGozPCtYGeW6FgzSg=; b=sy0pphTTw8wjjTpcfLKLFBToLIHklBfK7hFvlO+I7z0zsS9+pmjzt68/mG0OWkLzEH b5kLPxn+Xwu1/btErmDOp5NDbo8DFON0l/7xk0q3UXGnoDwIi7S9Qz1DMrmOz2DasRrP s9UVldU78/+i6m2MqpSGG2Kx/NziufabpHXskUJ0Dj8D9VMSqnW9kznmQhUXIqT9dskE 3/E6mBQjFtUFyBJgFWcoBbDv4FRsKtFMRQphfk8nEwJb49e2MROYjyU0bn6UkH62TVSA EkKVxvi/qklq/7SNZ49Z+Al0JE9QTo2S2Udbv8iXndjx1XBgHwZfCU6c6He2G0I9UB3s GQfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bo12-20020a0564020b2c00b0051e57693d06si559376edb.307.2023.07.09.03.07.13; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229984AbjGIJmF (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 05:42:05 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50162 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229593AbjGIJmE (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 05:42:04 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615F1D2; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 02:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 3699fslL021029; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 11:41:54 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 11:41:54 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: arnd@arndb.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, thomas@t-8ch.de Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/18] selftests/nolibc: allow run with minimal kernel config Message-ID: <20230709094154.GI9321@1wt.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Zhangjin, On Sat, Jul 08, 2023 at 02:21:20AM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > This patchset assumes the chmod_net removal patchset will be applied at > first, if not, the chmod_argv0 added alphabetically will not be applied. > Since our new chmod_argv0 is exactly added to replace chmod_net, so, > Willy, is it ok for you to at least apply the chmod_net removal patch > [5] before this patchset? Sure, and thanks for the reminder, I had missed it in the middle of the flood. (...) > LOG: testing summary: > > arch/board | result > ------------|------------ > arm/vexpress-a9 | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. > x86_64/pc | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. > mipsel/malta | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. > loongarch64/virt | 139 test(s) passed, 4 skipped, 0 failed. Great, I like this, thank you! That was precisely the purpose of the "skipped" initially, not to be too strictly bound to a specific config. Now it's indeed even more flexible and that's better. Series queued as well, thank you! Willy