Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp34053395rwd; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlEGOHTm+TIbieDA2ZRAoGdTLlZ/gEuPLobIV/bvNTJP2A+Yik4NA2qEp7RWOc6DVhzDMuNF X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:d155:b0:263:cfc9:754a with SMTP id t21-20020a17090ad15500b00263cfc9754amr7865490pjw.0.1688901488354; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1688901488; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jdkAwIipWq9lxJdXSbe/U6VtDUO+DIYvWhrWOWtG8LVdaNBta9JaVyhwsZwdSJVb1y Qe9Od+qlBWswBuPlEjbDKrxFn9w/rkNdEuYcrzAYGL+cb3aoIOVBOTHrsm8bmn2JXML4 VfF/p3mj7lmX27C0hZulp3N1LwJqC4Amc2p/zJkwgILSM/wEKPRL76vTlmsEWD8Y6Y4U cGzXseIlJKCSWbawAF/1w+MbVSbDVxUf4BF6dlJBsM5zpt4jkeY+9knYOXplmB9w7o65 TakqOUMXXwKzDLA5TsHWgpxrk+F9e9rBBn09GmJpJrXhy0KnqOJOV3OVthFasrwc1cY+ jcBQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=+TsUMkjY/ZoKAdTQrO70inZ3U6KP60kpcjIhKDCOivE=; fh=XyvGcUVVcnf9Sn3KaYdcsQlxg2RRoGX0/IAxOk3/FRo=; b=h2GcWCizC1tmLcvx/U2KzLlbFUN4WuaUQK/F3UMpLWTjz3n1ErU5F39auwJjVL1wJt egnGPdupN+Ai8HCPSUVRaYHyXOvMAHBWf8rUE+PitQxO2adHW6NbzDv2ehWMRsEPdS06 09xREG8Prag9XfyyN8eokbUS0bX1gsHf8o1ngP++gKrO9aqnbBa+B5z63DzBKg8IJmzZ NCEYdGsCg3w5Re1CiHmqCWvAxur1bevHYFTnRYmIC2vsRkDem7+mUYCQH54NyVgCeFTi fr9peTJWteuaRmI2BWjcPuPXxNOenZitq/pQ3Ee9vDexbWLLeURDCZi8Hh08Y3ujDe+6 Uyrw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id mp8-20020a17090b190800b0023def94be5esi5337979pjb.20.2023.07.09.04.17.56; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 04:18:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230107AbjGIJaD (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 05:30:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47960 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229494AbjGIJaC (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jul 2023 05:30:02 -0400 Received: from 1wt.eu (ded1.1wt.eu [163.172.96.212]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0BC691; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 02:30:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 3699TlvO019485; Sun, 9 Jul 2023 11:29:47 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 11:29:47 +0200 From: Willy Tarreau To: Zhangjin Wu Cc: linux@weissschuh.net, arnd@arndb.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] proc: proc_setattr for /proc/$PID/net Message-ID: <20230709092947.GF9321@1wt.eu> References: <20230624-proc-net-setattr-v1-0-73176812adee@weissschuh.net> <20230630140609.263790-1-falcon@tinylab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230630140609.263790-1-falcon@tinylab.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Fri, Jun 30, 2023 at 10:06:09PM +0800, Zhangjin Wu wrote: > Hi, Thomas > > Just applied your patchset on v6.4, and then: > > - revert the 1st patch: 'selftests/nolibc: drop test chmod_net' manually > > - do the 'run' test of nolibc on arm/vexpress-a9 > > The 'chmod_net' test of tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c > really failed as expected (and therefore, should be removed): > > 11 chdir_root = 0 [OK] > 12 chdir_dot = 0 [OK] > 13 chdir_blah = -1 ENOENT [OK] > 14 chmod_net = -1 EPERM [FAIL] > 15 chmod_self = -1 EPERM [OK] > 16 chmod_tmpdir = 0 [OK] > 17 chown_self = -1 EPERM [OK] > > So, If this test result is enough for this patch, here is my: > > Tested-by: Zhangjin Wu Now queued, thanks! Willy