Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:00:09 +0200
Message-ID: <87wmz8i746.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=22N=EDcolas_F=2E_R=2E_A=2E=22?= Prado 
        <nfraprado@collabora.com>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        kernel@collabora.com,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] kselftest/alsa: pcm-test: Decrease stream duration from 4 to 2 seconds
In-Reply-To: <06b8bfde-e4f1-48ea-aa3e-35d2fe5df046@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20230620220839.2215057-1-nfraprado@collabora.com>
        <20230620220839.2215057-3-nfraprado@collabora.com>
        <33bea0d3-b8dd-4936-812e-392166df4437@sirena.org.uk>
        <443f697b-fecf-6e8e-0b76-65257aff7da8@perex.cz>
        <9069ad0c-d166-4620-a3de-a36ab233cab0@sirena.org.uk>
        <5c2d5213-5299-44f1-9611-26002c8a5d3a@notapiano>
        <87352krcz5.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <f5cab2c2-1638-4d19-aff3-d46ed34b857e@sirena.org.uk>
        <87wmzwptu0.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
        <06b8bfde-e4f1-48ea-aa3e-35d2fe5df046@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 21 Jun 2023 20:19:46 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2023 at 08:13:11PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > It feels like it might be good to let it cook for a bit longer before
> > > going to Linus (eg, applying after the merge window) so we've more
> > > chance to see what the impact is on other boards?
> 
> > I'm fine with that option, too.  Are most of selftests performed on
> > linux-next basis, or rather on Linus tree?
> 
> For KernelCI we've got coverage on both.  I can also run stuff on the
> boards I have in my lab on demand of course, but there's more coverage
> in KernelCI.

OK, now I applied those two patches to for-next branch (i.e. for 6.6
kernel).  Let's watch out.


thanks,

Takashi