Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <7672f0b65cf7d2a1bb81019417aa3fa98fbac5e3.camel@crapouillou.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: dts: exynos/i9100: Fix LCD screen's
 physical size
From:   Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
        Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Cc:     devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 09:35:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <98b39071-cbfa-bc58-032e-56f6e9dd5c2a@linaro.org>
References: <20230708084027.18352-1-paul@crapouillou.net>
         <20230708084027.18352-4-paul@crapouillou.net>
         <98b39071-cbfa-bc58-032e-56f6e9dd5c2a@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk

Hi Krzysztof,

Le lundi 10 juillet 2023 =C3=A0 08:59 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski a =C3=A9cr=
it=C2=A0:
> On 08/07/2023 10:40, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> > The previous values were completely bogus, and resulted in the
> > computed
> > DPI ratio being much lower than reality, causing applications and
> > UIs to
> > misbehave.
> >=20
> > The new values were measured by myself with a ruler.
> >=20
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@crapouillou.net>
> > Fixes: 8620cc2f99b7 ("ARM: dts: exynos: Add devicetree file for the
> > Galaxy S2")
> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.8+
> > ---
>=20
> This does not apply. You rebased your work on some older
> version/tree,
> without new layout. Please work on linux-next.

This patchset was based on drm-misc-next, because that's where I was
planning to apply it; and it was extremely unlikely (but not
impossible, apparently) that the i9100.dts would be modified in the
meantime.

I can rebase on linux-next, the problem then is that I then don't know
how/where to apply the patchset.

Cheers,
-Paul