Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756550AbXJXFHA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:07:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754056AbXJXFGl (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:06:41 -0400 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:47041 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753956AbXJXFGi (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 01:06:38 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20071023.220622.68038077.davem@davemloft.net> To: barkalow@iabervon.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, linas@austin.ibm.com, chunhao.huang@hotmail.com, gregkh@suse.de, htejun@gmail.com, brice.goglin@gmail.com, david.gaarenstroom@gmail.com, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, shane.huang@amd.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, brice@myri.com, mchan@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4]: Resolve MSI vs. INTX_DISABLE quirks. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20071023.195108.69018458.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 5.1.52 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1299 Lines: 25 From: Daniel Barkalow Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 -0400 (EDT) > I'm not sure all of the pci_intx() calls in msi.c should be skipped when > the quirk applies; I think some of them might be there so that the legacy > interrupt won't be delivered while MSI is turned off (since the handler > isn't listening for the legacy interrupts). I'd guess this would cause > people to have their MSI-capable device kill their non-MSI-capable device > when they restore their laptop (and the shared interrupt fires and gets > stuck at just the wrong time). No idea if this is a real concern, but I'm > pretty sure that not all of those calls are recent. I don't think it's a real concern. > There's a couple of ATA drivers that look like they might be trying to > work around the same bug, but it's a bit hard to tell. It might be good to > have them use the quirk (or set the flag) because it's cleaner. I noticed these cases as well, and I would hope that Jeff would help out here using the infrastructure my patches created. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/