Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:57:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:57:30 -0500 Received: from topaz.3com.com ([192.156.136.158]:61576 "EHLO topaz.3com.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 20 Nov 2000 12:57:21 -0500 X-Lotus-FromDomain: 3COM From: Steven_Snyder@3com.com To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8825699D.005FFF54.00@hqoutbound.ops.3com.com> Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2000 11:27:19 -0600 Subject: Any advantage to kernel 2.4 in low-end system? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello. In reading about the cool new features of Linux v2.4, most of the improvements/changes seem to relate to high-end systems. Would users of low-end systems (386/486, low memory, etc.) be advised to stay with kernel v2.2.x or is v2.4.x the way to go for these systems as well? Thank you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/