Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 15:06:42 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc:     Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>,
        linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] memory: tegra: Add dummy implementation on Tegra194
Message-ID: <ZKwCYjKXtuDsOF9E@orome>
References: <20230629160132.768940-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com>
 <1fd1d5d7-7296-0e62-9f65-7347ac0f0500@linaro.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3MIRVxCUgwh5Njm1"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1fd1d5d7-7296-0e62-9f65-7347ac0f0500@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.10 (2023-03-25)
Precedence: bulk


--3MIRVxCUgwh5Njm1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 12:10:43PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/06/2023 18:01, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >=20
> > With the introduction of commit 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add
> > interconnect support in Tegra234"), the PCI driver on Tegra194 and later
> > requires an interconnect provider. However, a provider is currently only
> > exposed on Tegra234 and this causes PCI on Tegra194 to defer probe
> > indefinitely.
> >=20
> > Fix this by adding a dummy implementation on Tegra194. This allows nodes
> > to be provided to interconnect consumers, but doesn't do any bandwidth
> > accounting or frequency scaling.
> >=20
> > Fixes: 9365bf006f53 ("PCI: tegra194: Add interconnect support in Tegra2=
34")
> > Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
>=20
> Applied with checkpatch warning. Please be sure you run checkpatch
> before sending the patches.

Are you referring to the Reported-by/Closes complaint? I didn't include
a URL here because this came from an internal test report and there's no
corresponding public reference.

I suppose I could've left out the Reported-by altogether.

Thierry

--3MIRVxCUgwh5Njm1
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=YpDw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--3MIRVxCUgwh5Njm1--