Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754785AbXJXG3l (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:29:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753139AbXJXG3e (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:29:34 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:51394 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752993AbXJXG3d (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 02:29:33 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:59:33 +0530 From: Vivek Goyal To: Hiroshi Shimamoto Cc: hbabu@us.ibm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: add lapic_shutdown for x86_64 Message-ID: <20071024062933.GA4622@in.ibm.com> Reply-To: vgoyal@in.ibm.com References: <47195763.1090803@ct.jp.nec.com> <47195807.6030809@ct.jp.nec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47195807.6030809@ct.jp.nec.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1527 Lines: 50 On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 06:21:11PM -0700, Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote: > From: Hiroshi Shimamoto > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Shimamoto > --- > arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ > include/asm-x86/apic_64.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c > index f47bc49..f28ccb5 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic_64.c > @@ -287,6 +287,20 @@ void disable_local_APIC(void) > apic_write(APIC_SPIV, value); > } > > +void lapic_shutdown(void) > +{ > + unsigned long flags; > + > + if (!cpu_has_apic) > + return; > + > + local_irq_save(flags); > + > + disable_local_APIC(); > + > + local_irq_restore(flags); > +} > + > /* Do we really have to introduce this function for 64bit? I remember some issues were faced on i386 w.r.t kernel enabling the LAPIC against the wishes of BIOS hence kernel was disabling it while shutting down. No such problems were reported for x86_64 hence this function existed only for i386. If that is the case, probably we don't have to introduce lapic_shutdown() for x86_64. Instead call lapic_shutdown() for X86_32, and disble_local_APIC() otherwise? Thanks Vivek - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/