Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Mon, 10 Jul 2023 12:51:49 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To:     "Masami Hiramatsu (Google)" <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Cc:     Zehao Zhang <zhangzehao@vivo.com>, linkinjeon@kernel.org,
        sj1557.seo@samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exfat: Add ftrace support for exfat and add some
 tracepoints
Message-ID: <20230710125149.6424268a@gandalf.local.home>
In-Reply-To: <20230711013723.1b677cae2870bd509f77babd@kernel.org>
References: <20230710092559.19087-1-zhangzehao@vivo.com>
        <20230711013723.1b677cae2870bd509f77babd@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 01:37:23 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:

> It seems like most of them are address_space_operations' operators.
> Is that OK to define those events (~= user exposed interface) from
> exFAT filesystem? I wonder why we can not make a generic VFS events
> for those. (Or all FS-wide generic events).

Probably because the VFS maintainer has NACK'd all trace events in the
generic VFS subsystem :-(

-- Steve