Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp35664817rwd; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:35:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHJgMaIKdum/VSO2ng6WMfCT5cFsm4qGGslqQrQVAw27crSdcZQ+KPATGEldYyGBHCjevQh X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a0c:b0:1b6:69dc:44d2 with SMTP id v12-20020a1709029a0c00b001b669dc44d2mr11257831plp.51.1689010516708; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:35:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1689010516; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yABjAn39JF1oxRXyM2IcF9QWmazMPbUR+Eb+TqKrh7Es6Lb+dbLY7ZApmjpJgV7D81 7sTabJKkDywvqjhYOU/vHc6nwlyAyL2NEGrSA4dCpOuTdkxgbLO5PqElgC4ywGdiqCEK D0w1WuPXDxpfeIUjd7q0ig/Lt/9p1lSoXxszCpMG8WQcC2ojx4/wygEYWEK4vtsviRKH apcW5iGmEz+e5TYYGKYgpMfsxCFSa9p0cl63FH+w2pfvL8qIcSUKz4OoheHK+E/GeGwW OL6gkGUPfF9klzMarztXmf6RIzjMz2UyIOmI2YF/clNVa+kVwpLHiLzjTU9k8vAETUBh Id1w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=PBvSxQu69XLUCXDZw76YSGk7gCcPmWjVmgjW3fYGTbA=; fh=IyOYz2aApVSZcG0zYEej1oDoCpl4LIOyTRZ6Vqq7g1o=; b=ZC4choz8LoHGxhwN97AcfhUvZT2wuxrttshEsvyOaSWZqs7FZ07QQf5UT0W7NnyLUK jxZe3WSZcMHvTjxD+vNnwvoZKa+A8B38lRDR80ApbnzJDjSKpRONz0iGQQQZjN9Ktx0g lEZp9BXrZrnr87Uv7/86XyfEAgiGZx8owZtsBNjKelnIzyjDP8CLtNnQ225BBybI57uL BYG3AceVGmkumYmIo443T5zBzw+INIrkgBw7nNMKTAMUQgQ+K8Nht6sB6Q2O0PL/KgKR HkkYvQ1HTZC/2NsXfATKOrbk9/JPkEEZhoea427tyEWisrOlmlvDpPmf4uCpXyeI4evM 8Q2g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z24-20020a1709028f9800b001a6bb7b7a44si141884plo.307.2023.07.10.10.34.58; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232172AbjGJRKX (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:10:23 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34634 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230078AbjGJRKU (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jul 2023 13:10:20 -0400 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B1DFED7; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:10:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ip4d148da6.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([77.20.141.166] helo=truhe.fritz.box); authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1qIuOt-0006Iv-7K; Mon, 10 Jul 2023 19:10:15 +0200 From: Thorsten Leemhuis To: Greg KH , stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , Jonathan Corbet Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/3] docs: stable-kernel-rules: add delayed backporting option and a few tweaks Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 19:10:10 +0200 Message-Id: X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;linux@leemhuis.info;1689009018;df12a5bf; X-HE-SMSGID: 1qIuOt-0006Iv-7K X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is a RFC and a bit rough for now. I only set down to create the first of the three patches. But while doing so I noticed a few things that seemed odd for me with my background on writing and editing texts. So I just quickly performed a few additional changes to fix those to see if the stable team would appreciate them, as this document is clearly their domain. If those changes or even the initial patch are not welcomed, I'll simply drop them. I'd totally understand this, as texts like these are delicate and it's easy to accidentlly change the intent or the meaning while adjusting things in good faith. At the same time I might be willing to do a few more changes, if people like the direction this takes and want a bit more fine tuning. CC: Greg KH CC: Sasha Levin CC: Jonathan Corbet Thorsten Leemhuis (3): docs: stable-kernel-rules: mention other usages for stable tag comments docs: stable-kernel-rules: make rule section more straight forward docs: stable-kernel-rules: improve structure to optimize reading flow Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst | 189 ++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-) base-commit: 016571b6d52deb473676fb4d24baf8ed3667ae21 -- 2.40.1