Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754173AbXJXJAY (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:00:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752012AbXJXJAJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:00:09 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:52799 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751409AbXJXJAF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 05:00:05 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irq_flags_t: intro and core annotations Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:55:41 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: Herbert Xu , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, matthew@wil.cx, ralf@linux-mips.org, adobriyan@gmail.com, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org References: <471EA9D6.9000004@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <471EA9D6.9000004@garzik.org> X-Face: >j"dOR3XO=^3iw?0`(E1wZ/&le9!.ok[JrI=S~VlsF~}"P\+jx.GT@=?utf-8?q?=0A=09-oaEG?=,9Ba>v;3>:kcw#yO5?B:l{(Ln.2)=?utf-8?q?=27=7Dfw07+4-=26=5E=7CScOpE=3F=5D=5EXdv=5B/zWkA7=60=25M!DxZ=0A=09?= =?utf-8?q?8MJ=2EU5?="hi+2yT(k`PF~Zt;tfT,i,JXf=x@eLP{7B:"GyA\=UnN) =?utf-8?q?=26=26qdaA=3A=7D-Y*=7D=3A3YvzV9=0A=09=7E=273a=7E7I=7CWQ=5D?=<50*%U-6Ewmxfzdn/CK_E/ouMU(r?FAQG/ev^JyuX.%(By`" =?utf-8?q?L=5F=0A=09H=3Dbj?=)"y7*XOqz|SS"mrZ$`Q_syCd MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200710241055.42567.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/kfZyOIhHDN97F021B2ueJGbDRah2F8JPdndc 0FyO/qENd2Vpx05DXBK24dJd6OGM0iQ+h/2IKAsZ0HmhSXbtjq hkuEthfNJxTNVZziQHPTA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 814 Lines: 21 On Wednesday 24 October 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > > Could we add a debug option that warned if spin_lock_irq is > > executed with IRQs turned off already? > > Seems reasonable but perhaps arch-specific? > > Also, I think someone (akpm?) mentioned an effort had been made before, > and run into some problems. ?I don't have details... I already posted a patch in this thread that does exactly that (and warn about spin_unlock_irq with IRQs enabled), see my earlier reply. The patch works fine, but my feeling is that it belongs into lockdep instead. Arnd <>< - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/