Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: remove unneeded return value of
 cgroup_rm_cftypes_locked()
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
CC:     <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <lizefan.x@bytedance.com>,
        <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230701073856.2095425-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
 <ZKxeke6SfBe37Jso@slm.duckdns.org>
From:   Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <27428e7d-e280-2f78-7856-056d4e174057@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:00:58 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <ZKxeke6SfBe37Jso@slm.duckdns.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On 2023/7/11 3:40, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 01, 2023 at 03:38:56PM +0800, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> The return value of cgroup_rm_cftypes_locked() is always 0. So remove
>> it to simplify the code. No functional change intended.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
> 
> Applied to cgroup/for-6.6. Please feel free to follow up with the comment
> addition Michal suggested.

Should I send a v2 patch or a separate patch? Both is fine to me.

Thanks for your work.