Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 09:23:39 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
        kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 1/5] kdb: do not assume write() callback
 available
Message-ID: <20230711082339.GA26224@aspen.lan>
References: <20230710134524.25232-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <20230710134524.25232-2-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230710134524.25232-2-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 03:51:20PM +0206, John Ogness wrote:
> It is allowed for consoles to provide no write() callback. For
> example ttynull does this.
>
> Check if a write() callback is available before using it.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
> Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>

For v1 I shared an ack rather than queuing the patch. Although reading
the thread back it is possible that was based on a misunderstanding
(https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230309113020.GA78621@aspen.lan/ ).

Anyhow, it looks like you have designed the new series to be picked
individually?


Daniel.