Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 10:01:55 +0100
From:   Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To:     John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
Cc:     Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@windriver.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@atomlin.com>,
        kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v2 1/5] kdb: do not assume write() callback
 available
Message-ID: <20230711090155.GB26224@aspen.lan>
References: <20230710134524.25232-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <20230710134524.25232-2-john.ogness@linutronix.de>
 <20230711082339.GA26224@aspen.lan>
 <87lefmq0yk.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87lefmq0yk.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:04:11AM +0206, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2023-07-11, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote:
> > For v1 I shared an ack rather than queuing the patch. Although reading
> > the thread back it is possible that was based on a misunderstanding
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230309113020.GA78621@aspen.lan/ ).
> >
> > Anyhow, it looks like you have designed the new series to be picked
> > individually?
>
> I understood that Petr will carry the patch. Yes, this series only
> includes the non-atomic/non-threaded cleanups so that it will be easier
> for Petr to send the full series off to linux-next.

No worries, that's fine for me and from my point-of-view its still:
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>


> For this patch there is nothing left to do. I should have removed the
> kdb people/lists from the mailing. Sorry about that.

To be honest I'd rather be in the loop than out (and with that title my
mail filters would jump in it anyway).


Daniel.