Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 13:31:26 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To:     Chengming Zhou <chengming.zhou@linux.dev>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, axboe@kernel.dk,
        ming.lei@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhouchengming@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] blk-flush: fix rq->flush.seq for post-flush
 requests
Message-ID: <20230711113126.GA26978@lst.de>
References: <20230710064705.1847287-1-chengming.zhou@linux.dev> <20230710133024.GA23157@lst.de> <4431d779-e6e7-aff1-5cf8-4147de974d8d@linux.dev>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4431d779-e6e7-aff1-5cf8-4147de974d8d@linux.dev>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 07:06:20PM +0800, Chengming Zhou wrote:
> Ok, will add a Fixes tag and send it as a separate patch since it's a bug fix.

Btw, it's probably not worth resending patch 2 until we've figured out
and dealt with the SATA flush regression that Chuck reported.