Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 15:47:57 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>,
        Amit Kumar Mahapatra via Alsa-devel 
        <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
        Tharun Kumar P <tharunkumar.pasumarthi@microchip.com>,
        Vijaya Krishna Nivarthi <quic_vnivarth@quicinc.com>,
        Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= 
        <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        Sanjay R Mehta <sanju.mehta@amd.com>,
        Radu Pirea <radu_nicolae.pirea@upb.ro>,
        Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
        Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
        Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
        Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@kernel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@gmail.com>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@gmail.com>,
        Alain Volmat <alain.volmat@foss.st.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/15] spi: Remove code duplication in
 spi_add_device_locked()
Message-ID: <ZK1PfXsUJipjcCH6@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20230710154932.68377-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <20230710154932.68377-6-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
 <7557bada-3076-4d6e-a5c5-d368433706e2@sirena.org.uk>
 <ZK03rBqoQ0IZz617@smile.fi.intel.com>
 <20230711120133.45drgk46y4cz7aut@mercury.elektranox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230711120133.45drgk46y4cz7aut@mercury.elektranox.org>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:01:33PM +0200, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:06:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 06:16:22PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 06:49:22PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

...

> > > > -	struct device *dev = ctlr->dev.parent;
> > > > -
> > > > -	/* Chipselects are numbered 0..max; validate. */
> > > > -	if (spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0) >= ctlr->num_chipselect) {
> > > > -		dev_err(dev, "cs%d >= max %d\n", spi_get_chipselect(spi, 0),
> > > > -			ctlr->num_chipselect);
> > > > -		return -EINVAL;
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	/* Set the bus ID string */
> > > > -	spi_dev_set_name(spi);
> > > 
> > > I see that this is duplicating spi_add_device() (and we really could do
> > > better with code sharing there I think) but I can't immediately see
> > > where the duplication that's intended to be elimiated is here - where
> > > else in the one call path that spi_add_device_locked() has would we do
> > > the above?  Based on the changelog I was expecting to see some
> > > duplicated code in the function itself.
> > 
> > Oh, by some reason Sebastian wasn't in this rather long Cc list.
> > Added him.
> > 
> > Reading again I don't see any useful explanation why that piece of code has to
> > be duplicated among these two functions. It's 100% a copy.
> > 
> > Sebastian, can you shed some light here?
> 
> The patch in this thread is obviously wrong. It results in the
> checks never beeing called for spi_add_device_locked(). The copy is
> in spi_add_device() and those two are not calling into each other.

Ah, now I see, I missed __ in the name.
Thank you for opening my eyes!

> But it should be fine to move the code to the start of
> __spi_add_device(), which allows removing the duplication. In that
> case the code will be run with the add_lock held, which is probably
> what I was worried about two years ago. Looking at it again, the
> lock is held anyways in case of spi_add_device_locked().

Right, I will re-do that.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko