Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:42:13 +0200
Message-ID: <87jzv6h2ui.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From:   Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc:     Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Amadeusz =?ISO-8859-2?Q?S=B3awi=F1ski?= 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] PCI: Define Intel PCI IDs and use them in drivers
In-Reply-To: <46d612f4-24a4-4493-aa9f-0ace5225a38b@sirena.org.uk>
References: <20230711125726.3509391-1-amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
        <bc2484ba-3bb2-7d74-fcd1-55c9ec253b9c@linux.intel.com>
        <46d612f4-24a4-4493-aa9f-0ace5225a38b@sirena.org.uk>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:36:20 +0200,
Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:24:07PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > On 7/11/23 14:57, Amadeusz S?awi?ski wrote:
> 
> > > Simplify things, by adding PCI IDs to global header and make use of them
> > > in drivers. This allows for removal of comments by having IDs themselves
> > > being self explanatory. Additionally it allows for removal of existing
> > > inconsistencies by having one source of truth.
> 
> > I'd like to hear from Takashi and Mark on how this would work, we have
> > to provide new PCI IDs for both trees using a common 'pci_ids.h' file.
> 
> We can probably just agree on a tree to apply things and work from
> there.

Yes, simply apply on top of 6.5-rc1 or such a stable point and tag it.
Then other trees can merging it.

I can do it if both Bjorn and Mark agree (after all patches get
reviewed and no objection comes up).


Takashi