Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Tue, 11 Jul 2023 11:19:30 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To:     Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Amadeusz =?utf-8?B?U8WCYXdpxYRza2k=?= 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org,
        linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] PCI: Define Intel PCI IDs and use them in drivers
Message-ID: <20230711161930.GA250687@bhelgaas>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87jzv6h2ui.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:42:13PM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:36:20 +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 05:24:07PM +0200, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > > On 7/11/23 14:57, Amadeusz Sławiński wrote:
> > 
> > > > Simplify things, by adding PCI IDs to global header and make use of them
> > > > in drivers. This allows for removal of comments by having IDs themselves
> > > > being self explanatory. Additionally it allows for removal of existing
> > > > inconsistencies by having one source of truth.
> > 
> > > I'd like to hear from Takashi and Mark on how this would work, we have
> > > to provide new PCI IDs for both trees using a common 'pci_ids.h' file.
> > 
> > We can probably just agree on a tree to apply things and work from
> > there.
> 
> Yes, simply apply on top of 6.5-rc1 or such a stable point and tag it.
> Then other trees can merging it.
> 
> I can do it if both Bjorn and Mark agree (after all patches get
> reviewed and no objection comes up).

Sure.  I acked the PCI ones, so you can merge these via whatever tree
makes the most sense.  We might have minor conflicts during the merge
window, but they should be easy to fix.

Bjorn