Received: by 2002:a05:6358:3188:b0:123:57c1:9b43 with SMTP id q8csp37701170rwd; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:04:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlF5v9++3TbWnZP/QmpLJ4X6qJ3X5RKbQ7QsrJy2Vqi1TFXGktlP5VO4r6Xw6JkMm5LnXKgV X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3582:b0:514:a566:104a with SMTP id y2-20020a056402358200b00514a566104amr16033735edc.3.1689127471711; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:04:31 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1689127471; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=gDwBk0Ey2wnHt5FAC80MuOh9tACZNogGg72j2E40arQYSfUHAwnIcT7wpW0jehMC0O bk4x9+l3x7qjFZEbvA/uBrdXvNYbYe+kFkCXKMjzQCivOS/BWZsdL63wHSBdhlrQAcSV 9GxeCxyHEg3ll9xrZ8YXl7oyEr0zpNamBkAuJQRja+8V1eJhPfnfuID171Mvi8jGU3o3 3CSBTGAmij2+F4yGvDZOhOpLveIrBpqEXWVYtd9qxX7BBtJWSjfHrdZErFJ0/WdW7Eel cCwswTtTf/cI1jVvYnohdwPx5o+c2UdQVCnOu86IruJIb0jYsy78ujHgkxCQLq2NjSmE haMQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from :references:cc:to:content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:dkim-signature; bh=hjcVNlm1QHPLHd3o5VX5SMRDQLPooaBXWy9axao0xME=; fh=V3iHxQYHK8jTWdIKJQ9B8C3tSIIUA7cUxCLSi/QWgDg=; b=fcjSi7orI5tvp+n5fvP/y/VmyMhmIZc6+np9qr3fOEwJexm30mBndBFLEU8MCjHbbL S1JK6uuTLnPClqH6nByVTZW67IXW8gw3fHB1J1BjsFnsV72zhFZgRKxBPcfu94EbYEUs ogAoibPMXMk32W1UdVWJqTuYMxAnNQNe5sZgJ3K88xLdwb4ziXTJSHZIsT9it/91XixG 2EP6apH+wh6xxV0lju71YNavFjblFa+sDuE+rctsBenFn9OXG7CZj9XFnY4u5da2CFNx Oo23aEFKE/YJzfUiiohgEGrCWyIrWpH9XFABFA3/sVvl0IWAW+HYVERuEBSm4+1NX5Gp LWOQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=NkniyM1Q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i13-20020aa7dd0d000000b0051df225e708si3552675edv.46.2023.07.11.19.04.07; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 19:04:31 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=NkniyM1Q; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230329AbjGLBdw (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:33:52 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54772 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229489AbjGLBdv (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jul 2023 21:33:51 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33E19CF for ; Tue, 11 Jul 2023 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5F2D615D3 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 01:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 25D65C433C8; Wed, 12 Jul 2023 01:33:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1689125629; bh=2S6wbnljUFNSm7ROG4giIHQvf1V+Wm4CNR7UiKL6Wp8=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=NkniyM1QqJrEVjZXIwSmV55WRRuUt+bvS7kEncVAPpwPW3SmCif/MhisyuH0NcuaV MFk1ijI4+Nzz8Kx321MHmncS/OGlQl1yDyTjmOZpnzE1GTt98HxwLJH99Ak6t9LNI+ PS0wXGoSpb0ipsboJbPSSJuozLmnJGpYNLkka44Oc33dwlC+LYcyc10chHkDiPuik0 KVWdEnM3HArRbQmo0F/w+bk74ic/EaW1+SE6qgzp3CdKHcaamsnNi+X4Lkm9iMyV/l GjwYQBgfwpohywDMtmjSp0fPkGC8lnpH5HucQV3zJPL9wxVx/aZMWMXvqpcPtHVj8M m7eSwACqOZj6A== Message-ID: <330c96f7-fbad-dd17-6368-f1378b3b5375@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:33:45 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2] f2fs: do not issue small discard commands during checkpoint Content-Language: en-US To: Jaegeuk Kim Cc: Daejun Park , linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20230613203947.2745943-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <50d5fa8c-4fe9-8a03-be78-0b5383e55b62@kernel.org> <65143701-4c19-ab66-1500-abd1162639cd@kernel.org> From: Chao Yu In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2023/7/12 0:37, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > On 07/06, Chao Yu wrote: >> On 2023/7/6 1:30, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>> On 07/04, Chao Yu wrote: >>>> On 2023/7/4 18:53, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>> On 07/03, Chao Yu wrote: >>>>>> On 2023/6/15 0:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: >>>>>>> If there're huge # of small discards, this will increase checkpoint latency >>>>>>> insanely. Let's issue small discards only by trim. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Change log from v1: >>>>>>> - move the skip logic to avoid dangling objects >>>>>>> >>>>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 2 +- >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>>>> index 8c7af8b4fc47..0457d620011f 100644 >>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>>>> @@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>>>>> len = next_pos - cur_pos; >>>>>>> if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) || >>>>>>> - (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen)) >>>>>>> + !force || len < cpc->trim_minlen) >>>>>>> goto skip; >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for late reply. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have a configuration for such case, what do you think of setting >>>>>> max_small_discards to zero? otherwise, w/ above change, max_small_discards >>>>>> logic may be broken? >>>>>> >>>>>> What: /sys/fs/f2fs//max_small_discards >>>>>> Date: November 2013 >>>>>> Contact: "Jaegeuk Kim" >>>>>> Description: Controls the issue rate of discard commands that consist of small >>>>>> blocks less than 2MB. The candidates to be discarded are cached until >>>>>> checkpoint is triggered, and issued during the checkpoint. >>>>>> By default, it is disabled with 0. >>>>>> >>>>>> Or, if we prefer to disable small_discards by default, what about below change: >>>>> >>>>> I think small_discards is fine, but need to avoid long checkpoint latency only. >>>> >>>> I didn't get you, do you mean we can still issue small discard by >>>> fstrim, so small_discards functionality is fine? >>> >>> You got the point. >> >> Well, actually, what I mean is max_small_discards sysfs entry's functionality >> is broken. Now, the entry can not be used to control number of small discards >> committed by checkpoint. > > Could you descrbie this problem first? Oh, alright, actually, I've described this problem literally, but maybe it's not clear, let me give some examples as below: echo 0 > /sys/fs/f2fs/vdb/max_small_discards xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "pwrite 0 2m" -c "fsync" xfs_io /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fpunch 0 4k" sync cat /proc/fs/f2fs/vdb/discard_plist_info |head -2 echo 100 > /sys/fs/f2fs/vdb/max_small_discards rm /mnt/f2fs/file xfs_io -f /mnt/f2fs/file -c "pwrite 0 2m" -c "fsync" xfs_io /mnt/f2fs/file -c "fpunch 0 4k" sync cat /proc/fs/f2fs/vdb/discard_plist_info |head -2 Before the patch: Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist): 0 . . . . . . . . Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist): 0 3 1 . . . . . . After the patch: Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist): 0 . . . . . . . . Discard pend list(Show diacrd_cmd count on each entry, .:not exist): 0 . . . . . . . . So, now max_small_discards can not be used to control small discard number cached by checkpoint. Thanks, > >> >> I think there is another way to achieve "avoid long checkpoint latency caused >> by committing huge # of small discards", the way is we can set max_small_discards >> to small value or zero, w/ such configuration, it will take checkpoint much less >> time or no time to committing small discard due to below control logic: >> >> f2fs_flush_sit_entries() >> { >> ... >> if (!(cpc->reason & CP_DISCARD)) { >> cpc->trim_start = segno; >> add_discard_addrs(sbi, cpc, false); >> } >> ... >> } >> >> add_discard_addrs() >> { >> ... >> while (force || SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->nr_discards <= >> SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info->max_discards) { >> >> It will break the loop once nr_discards is larger than max_discards, if >> max_discards is set to zero, checkpoint won't take time to handle small discards. >> >> ... >> if (!de) { >> de = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(discard_entry_slab, >> GFP_F2FS_ZERO, true, NULL); >> de->start_blkaddr = START_BLOCK(sbi, cpc->trim_start); >> list_add_tail(&de->list, head); >> } >> ... >> } >> ... >> >> Thanks, >> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From eb89d9b56e817e3046d7fa17165b12416f09d456 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>>>>> From: Chao Yu >>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2023 09:06:53 +0800 >>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] Revert "f2fs: enable small discard by default" >>>>>> >>>>>> This reverts commit d618ebaf0aa83d175658aea5291e0c459d471d39 in order >>>>>> to disable small discard by default, so that if there're huge number of >>>>>> small discards, it will decrease checkpoint's latency obviously. >>>>>> >>>>>> Also, this patch reverts 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard >>>>>> commands during checkpoint"), due to it breaks small discard feature which >>>>>> may be configured via sysfs entry max_small_discards. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fixes: 9ac00e7cef10 ("f2fs: do not issue small discard commands during checkpoint") >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu >>>>>> --- >>>>>> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 4 ++-- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>>> index 14c822e5c9c9..0a313368f18b 100644 >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c >>>>>> @@ -2193,7 +2193,7 @@ void f2fs_clear_prefree_segments(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, >>>>>> len = next_pos - cur_pos; >>>>>> >>>>>> if (f2fs_sb_has_blkzoned(sbi) || >>>>>> - !force || len < cpc->trim_minlen) >>>>>> + (force && len < cpc->trim_minlen)) >>>>>> goto skip; >>>>>> >>>>>> f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, entry->start_blkaddr + cur_pos, >>>>>> @@ -2269,7 +2269,7 @@ static int create_discard_cmd_control(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) >>>>>> atomic_set(&dcc->queued_discard, 0); >>>>>> atomic_set(&dcc->discard_cmd_cnt, 0); >>>>>> dcc->nr_discards = 0; >>>>>> - dcc->max_discards = MAIN_SEGS(sbi) << sbi->log_blocks_per_seg; >>>>>> + dcc->max_discards = 0; >>>>>> dcc->max_discard_request = DEF_MAX_DISCARD_REQUEST; >>>>>> dcc->min_discard_issue_time = DEF_MIN_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; >>>>>> dcc->mid_discard_issue_time = DEF_MID_DISCARD_ISSUE_TIME; >>>>>> -- >>>>>> 2.40.1 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> f2fs_issue_discard(sbi, entry->start_blkaddr + cur_pos,