Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754815AbXJXQQQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:16:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753001AbXJXQQB (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:16:01 -0400 Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:41181 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752740AbXJXQQA (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:16:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 18:17:31 +0200 From: Sam Ravnborg To: Randy Dunlap Cc: Jeff Garzik , Mathieu Desnoyers , Christoph Hellwig , LKML , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [RFC/git patch] move samples/ to Documentation/markers/ Message-ID: <20071024161731.GB3166@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20071024095226.GA30326@havoc.gtf.org> <20071024130557.GA18610@Krystal> <471F4649.3000000@garzik.org> <20071024091240.7978c2da.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071024091240.7978c2da.rdunlap@xenotime.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1481 Lines: 38 On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 09:12:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:19:05 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > Honestly, I don't care at all about building the code. If that's what > > you want, great. > > Yes, that is wanted. They bitrot too easily -- not good. > > > My objection is more to adding a samples/ directory, which is contra to > > past experience: > > > > A new net driver sample should go in drivers/net/ like the existing > > skeleton files I already listed, not samples/net/. A top-level > > Can't disagree with that. > > > "samples/" seems like it exists only duplicate the rest of the tree > > hierarchy. > > It seems odd to be building code in Documentation/, but I can live > with that. It was primarily Christoph who was opposed to that. > He suggested samples/ and I went along with it just to break the > impasse (since no one else was making any comments on it at that > time). > > Sam, would building code in Documentation/ cause problems for > kbuild? I have this pipe dream that we shall introduce a tool to make the .txt doc readable in some popular format (HTML?) and then we would have that Makefile in Documentation/ but that could be a special target so should be OK. Sam - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/