Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
CC:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>, "vadfed@meta.com" <vadfed@meta.com>,
        "jonathan.lemon@gmail.com" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
        "pabeni@redhat.com" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        "corbet@lwn.net" <corbet@lwn.net>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "edumazet@google.com" <edumazet@google.com>,
        "vadfed@fb.com" <vadfed@fb.com>,
        "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
        "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>,
        "M, Saeed" <saeedm@nvidia.com>,
        "leon@kernel.org" <leon@kernel.org>,
        "richardcochran@gmail.com" <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
        "sj@kernel.org" <sj@kernel.org>,
        "javierm@redhat.com" <javierm@redhat.com>,
        "ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com" <ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com>,
        "mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>,
        "tzimmermann@suse.de" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
        "Michalik, Michal" <michal.michalik@intel.com>,
        "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com" 
        <jacek.lawrynowicz@linux.intel.com>,
        "airlied@redhat.com" <airlied@redhat.com>,
        "ogabbay@kernel.org" <ogabbay@kernel.org>,
        "arnd@arndb.de" <arnd@arndb.de>,
        "nipun.gupta@amd.com" <nipun.gupta@amd.com>,
        "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
        "linux@zary.sk" <linux@zary.sk>,
        "masahiroy@kernel.org" <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        "benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
        "geert+renesas@glider.be" <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
        "Olech, Milena" <milena.olech@intel.com>,
        "kuniyu@amazon.com" <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
        "liuhangbin@gmail.com" <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
        "hkallweit1@gmail.com" <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        "andy.ren@getcruise.com" <andy.ren@getcruise.com>,
        "razor@blackwall.org" <razor@blackwall.org>,
        "idosch@nvidia.com" <idosch@nvidia.com>,
        "lucien.xin@gmail.com" <lucien.xin@gmail.com>,
        "nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com" <nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com>,
        "phil@nwl.cc" <phil@nwl.cc>,
        "claudiajkang@gmail.com" <claudiajkang@gmail.com>,
        "linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, poros <poros@redhat.com>,
        mschmidt <mschmidt@redhat.com>,
        "linux-clk@vger.kernel.org" <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
        "vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev" <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API
Thread-Topic: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API
Thread-Index: AQHZpc/u2XBvfmJQckCFu+3HjTH4RK+edcOAgAF/xCCAACKYgIASxLqggAAmaYCAAXNRwIAAGjOAgAAtYHCAAF7igIAA2ZKg
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 09:19:53 +0000
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB465701C009D1DC2972F900F29B36A@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20230623123820.42850-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com>
        <ZJq3a6rl6dnPMV17@nanopsycho>
        <DM6PR11MB4657084DDD7554663F86C1C19B24A@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
        <ZJwWXZmZe4lQ04iK@nanopsycho>
        <DM6PR11MB4657751607C36FC711271D639B30A@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
        <ZKv1FRTXWLnLGRRS@nanopsycho>
        <DM6PR11MB46575D14FFE115546FDC9DEB9B31A@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
        <ZK1CizcqjqO1L/RQ@nanopsycho>
        <DM6PR11MB4657067EE043F4DBB9D8B03B9B31A@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
 <20230711131443.2a4af476@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230711131443.2a4af476@kernel.org>
Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: =?us-ascii?Q?vhJEQqmjUeV6oHqTHymoa/i+qaH02xAgjN2iku4WbRU9sm+VuLn2T2MKJYf0?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?JQY4EaP6J7iU7uGOrI3ZX+eeFOWuPAOF/enXu5IAdmxpY+4B4rNgDMp7bKyv?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?W/fKDkS7SPp+hWzU13LLOTahm6RhBhfNzuvZMgP+dPOY//QLqZ/mTycpfN5W?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?eGVXf5FNnNYd9da/5Rf7RAgzvN5mWCz9JsN9+s91s7FgKET3difhz4OIMwfL?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?t05Yikg9/NJhMefFFjicomXgBZZ3tcBzG7kkY52G1KuFMOnJYm5FThHnmOyK?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?aDceL1Q+RJqx/EkyRPyJ7wo91fcYIOMP+B1/eXyJDrkReV6AwDRROI16q67P?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?+y+5m3OaR00MS+b2+cBHKOFUb1XleW8SspgGMtNduwpIfaMESld9US6IGMXI?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?Vl1g6dxz5+cYKaJoMCz7R0UDW9+gpEQGInhCLynfx2ES8jH68xdGFWheOAza?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?3pTUExBhCCrbrOStA2640ylhYpAgMT4JzgHu0DAm22BHgEAC2S4octM5PAcw?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?AhhPSXU9oTulrPHFdcfo4AygPEp2qMY3bvrdSn6/Dce27vkGYRQG5G0HbkJe?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?kb19dQRahtFLW9OTfcdXdUcxgd8IY4fXBS9uwvscZcaSIgk1fkW7ZwJivBGi?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?cfTEH/ScHji/a+WX7EARGvbRYdfilRHH3V2CqUea21/l8iBvW1hY7ML91YET?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?VDZnd/bMuG7niNLG5abs9aXL86CEHmwYVU/DurGUHJRheb46jtR0LJjANnwp?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?doht+VWYFxBsEwPAtWMyI2WLy2IGtMhecQruxsTGcjTQxdhEfVL+jvjvEoE8?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?HfxNDpLHrORvLkkfmaRUDiFM3gDMn3hG2fegS2+O4GOFEXh7PFXgTSqh/Uqv?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?mEclhxcaOcKCW8U6Re/jzATvkFGDvPXBn2JmWjLp0d/UI8lUuOQxq7dbFDZz?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?mRpnSRhouZiGGlhsZ/xSdyRmq1XjyovizGm1n4RvCOx1laF77WRY9IXEFiZP?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?xxsSC8iKneH+vNVJrB28Gdg5O/VdbLIwgK6IVnsZiO8y/Cd9po/Y8K8t3QNl?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?xqneAP6vh5n7fjX0b4+JnHHqHPu43XhRw9w2HdaDgDuQj7kuE0NDHgNnml77?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?1ZWjG04qvc4nwCSsvXMhKBmjf5/N7wvzjN2p8fD2VEuEAoZjqIgK/aEcrLK+?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?odwGbH8WS+kGI3HQ4dFr2niRMhMCHm1o4lEFejmXZqTPKxG9WZ/ZFWdF0os8?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?gw4R81FMCTdBBK35X1Gum14lLoHlbhEJKf2yQJ2Jz5B4l73RfaMwxoGU0O5N?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?+GGHv97itu9g2MqYHxB1rf5Hed61R9R4n/SpaIxmLjFsvrCRk3v1jmrEKnYI?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?vIVWmi26IXT02z0x2EL+DoQsTpt0Kkw88zxFAT8r5JrHSbRtxifzDxdteGwP?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?0p72+5jM5BBkIrI+9HWlWA7H7kA3oydJHAfDy+dcTVrtio0rIdi0fXEGJifJ?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?uFt2z73kuYXPEQwHwCUFJXMHb5QsBde0nZsKhJbdwaMkyj6mKyvhLRnn3e/r?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?mwBoM53+Ueo59qPTuZus2y5i7PxM7o9UOdackmUU73zvnh2aTSzB7LTlVBb7?=
 =?us-ascii?Q?TQ=3D=3D?=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 889b3cc2-3985-4a06-29d9-08db82b92705
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 12 Jul 2023 09:19:53.7979
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 46c98d88-e344-4ed4-8496-4ed7712e255d
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: 8g3Bg/+DhyBHzG8jsJs7h1wKukyslvp0da0kGbhFR20Lgf0QIopyIdc6DTo7a3PMMhoOrzzgI2pOQlHcTHw1JERj/BRRUJsnnVWCYcTa910=
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SA2PR11MB5068
X-OriginatorOrg: intel.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,
        DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
        SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,URIBL_BLOCKED
        autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
        lindbergh.monkeyblade.net
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
>Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 10:15 PM
>
>On Tue, 11 Jul 2023 17:17:51 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
>> >I think better to add the check to pin-register so future synce pin
>> >users don't have similar weird ideas. Could you please add this check?
>>
>> Don't think it is way to go, and I don't think there is anything good
>> with preventing device drivers from labeling their pins the way they
>>want.
>
>We had a long argument about how label should have a clearly defined
>meaning. We're not going to rehash it on every revision. What did I miss :=
|

Well, as I understand we are discussing if dpll subsystem shall prevent
labeling the SyncE type pins. I have labeled them in ice explicitly with
the name of a pci device they belong to.

You haven't miss much, mostly the problem is described in this thread.

Thank you!
Arkadiusz