Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
From:   Chin Yik Ming <yikming2222@gmail.com>
To:     mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Cc:     dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com,
        mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chin Yik Ming <yikming2222@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Fixed typo
Date:   Wed, 12 Jul 2023 23:33:27 +0800
Message-Id: <20230712153327.3171-1-yikming2222@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

task_struct's state member is prefixed by "__"

Signed-off-by: Chin Yik Ming <yikming2222@gmail.com>
---
 include/linux/sched.h | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 609bde814..942c61dce 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ struct user_event_mm;
  * Task state bitmask. NOTE! These bits are also
  * encoded in fs/proc/array.c: get_task_state().
  *
- * We have two separate sets of flags: task->state
+ * We have two separate sets of flags: task->__state
  * is about runnability, while task->exit_state are
  * about the task exiting. Confusing, but this way
  * modifying one set can't modify the other one by
  * mistake.
  */
 
-/* Used in tsk->state: */
+/* Used in tsk->__state: */
 #define TASK_RUNNING			0x00000000
 #define TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE		0x00000001
 #define TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE		0x00000002
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ struct user_event_mm;
 #define EXIT_DEAD			0x00000010
 #define EXIT_ZOMBIE			0x00000020
 #define EXIT_TRACE			(EXIT_ZOMBIE | EXIT_DEAD)
-/* Used in tsk->state again: */
+/* Used in tsk->__state again: */
 #define TASK_PARKED			0x00000040
 #define TASK_DEAD			0x00000080
 #define TASK_WAKEKILL			0x00000100
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ struct user_event_mm;
 #endif
 
 /*
- * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->state
+ * set_current_state() includes a barrier so that the write of current->__state
  * is correctly serialised wrt the caller's subsequent test of whether to
  * actually sleep:
  *
@@ -196,9 +196,9 @@ struct user_event_mm;
  *   wake_up_state(p, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
  *
  * where wake_up_state()/try_to_wake_up() executes a full memory barrier before
- * accessing p->state.
+ * accessing p->__state.
  *
- * Wakeup will do: if (@state & p->state) p->state = TASK_RUNNING, that is,
+ * Wakeup will do: if (@state & p->__state) p->__state = TASK_RUNNING, that is,
  * once it observes the TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE store the waking CPU can issue a
  * TASK_RUNNING store which can collide with __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING).
  *
-- 
2.34.1