Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Message-ID: <59d54d8a-7c23-c6d3-5608-b06b1ce31bda@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 06:58:58 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: micron-st: enable lock/unlock for mt25qu512a
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Mamta Shukla <mamta.shukla@leica-geosystems.com>
Cc:     pratyush@kernel.org, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at,
        vigneshr@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        bsp-development.geo@leica-geosystems.com
References: <20230705130010.2999839-1-mamta.shukla@leica-geosystems.com>
 <419d80f252f12f091b9c555da0965c84@walle.cc>
 <582915cc4adc89b8ce16568f4d0421ca@walle.cc>
From:   Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
In-Reply-To: <582915cc4adc89b8ce16568f4d0421ca@walle.cc>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 06.07.2023 10:26, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2023-07-05 15:22, schrieb Michael Walle:
> 
>> FWIW, I noticed the difference between MT25QU and MT25QL here. But
>> I don't think we can do anything about it. It is just another example,
>> that the name is mostly irrelavant/cannot be trusted. Vendors tend to
>> reuse the id for different (software compatible probably) parts. Maybe
>> we can get rid of it entirely. Tudor, Pratyush?
> 
> I must have been blind, the ID is different (ba vs bb), but my point
> is still valid.
> 

the name is good for debug purposes to differentiate between flashes
that use the same ID. But otherwise I too don't see a great benefit of
showing/printing the flash name.