Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:42:04 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
Cc:     "isaku.yamahata@gmail.com" <isaku.yamahata@gmail.com>,
        "Hansen, Dave" <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        "Christopherson,, Sean" <seanjc@google.com>,
        "bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>, "x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
        "hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        "tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        "Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>,
        "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
        "sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com" 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] x86/virt/tdx: Wire up basic SEAMCALL functions
Message-ID: <20230713074204.GA3139243@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <cover.1689151537.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
 <41b7e5503a3e6057dc168b3c5a9693651c501d22.1689151537.git.kai.huang@intel.com>
 <20230712221510.GG3894444@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <4202b26acdb3fe926dd1a9a46c2c7c35a5d85529.camel@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <4202b26acdb3fe926dd1a9a46c2c7c35a5d85529.camel@intel.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 03:46:52AM +0000, Huang, Kai wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-07-12 at 15:15 -0700, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > > The SEAMCALL ABI is very similar to the TDCALL ABI and leverages much
> > > TDCALL infrastructure.? Wire up basic functions to make SEAMCALLs for
> > > the basic TDX support: __seamcall(), __seamcall_ret() and
> > > __seamcall_saved_ret() which is for TDH.VP.ENTER leaf function.
> > 
> > Hi.? __seamcall_saved_ret() uses struct tdx_module_arg as input and output.? For
> > KVM TDH.VP.ENTER case, those arguments are already in unsigned long
> > kvm_vcpu_arch::regs[].? It's silly to move those values twice.? From
> > kvm_vcpu_arch::regs to tdx_module_args.? From tdx_module_args to real registers.
> > 
> > If TDH.VP.ENTER is the only user of __seamcall_saved_ret(), can we make it to
> > take unsigned long kvm_vcpu_argh::regs[NR_VCPU_REGS]?? Maybe I can make the
> > change with TDX KVM patch series.
> 
> The assembly code assumes the second argument is a pointer to 'struct
> tdx_module_args'.  I don't know how can we change __seamcall_saved_ret() to
> achieve what you said.  We might change the kvm_vcpu_argh::regs[NR_VCPU_REGS] to
> match 'struct tdx_module_args''s layout and manually convert part of "regs" to
> the structure and pass to __seamcall_saved_ret(), but it's too hacky I suppose.

I suspect the kvm_vcpu_arch::regs layout is given by hardware; so the
only option would be to make tdx_module_args match that. It's a slightly
unfortunate layout, but meh.

Then you can simply do:

	__seamcall_saved_ret(leaf, (struct tdx_module_args *)vcpu->arch->regs);