Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20;
Date:   Thu, 13 Jul 2023 14:21:40 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     stanley.chu@mediatek.com, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
        martin.petersen@oracle.com, matthias.bgg@gmail.com,
        angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com,
        linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] scsi: ufs: ufs-mediatek: Remove surplus dev_err()
Message-ID: <20230713132140.azamscgceh6yyy6j@bogus>
References: <20230712064832.44188-1-yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20230713131123.uo5ofltbhvktkevd@bogus>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230713131123.uo5ofltbhvktkevd@bogus>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 02:11:23PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 02:48:32PM +0800, Yang Li wrote:
> > There is no need to call the dev_err() function directly to print a
> > custom message when handling an error from either the platform_get_irq()
> > or platform_get_irq_byname() functions as both are going to display an
> > appropriate error message in case of a failure.
> > 
> > ./drivers/ufs/host/ufs-mediatek.c:864:3-10: line 864 is redundant because platform_get_irq() already prints an error
> > 
> > Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com>
> > Closes: https://bugzilla.openanolis.cn/show_bug.cgi?id=5846
> 
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> 

Sorry for this, I didn't mean to ack this patch, no idea how on earth I
managed to do that (must be some wrong key combination in my email client)
but I wanted and meant to ack only this [1]. Sorry for the noise.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230712062853.11007-9-frank.li@vivo.com