Received: by 2002:a05:6358:7058:b0:131:369:b2a3 with SMTP id 24csp1621671rwp; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:52:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlGERqqcyH2E9yEAAayvGsvD9eDp6tKUY72yS5QR3haAbsF7RmRTej1xMcil3DfZnPdMnF06 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1943:b0:67a:6ba0:3a6 with SMTP id s3-20020a056a00194300b0067a6ba003a6mr2214935pfk.21.1689281554895; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1689281554; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yu+XNhELORbf1md4ouk1vTvqGYz5GmgfgyFwAjpgHE5aaHDouK9qQnoqeB9cnqFqqV LFg/vYkwAU2RANTTzXB5qjJzEGxq17P8A9/piYpdsFyix4JHOx1KTayh6P94Bk0u+cD9 jTlXG0ikq9/HIN+C9ZybSd34OZdrUVzaA+O6KVLQm1xGkQCNEQaOdshLIm6cM1CR7zOx Cks2Nv2ntELn9OjICcV03CrPOxdbkCHwvk0lQ0S3JffWlphWfn40s6ur8h1H9t41EroU xadbSDI5sEpvC93dDu8RAhmrcW5xt7xrfLGC2uA4KZFob5nB430yj4vUEmQLZm+bIV0L /JxA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to :date:references:subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=OCbyQDFiXgp3czjaCN0LZJhyRPoDhTEyRb41OL4Vb5k=; fh=8oUkBj3QAf7WcMwjQbhJLo9Po4p2CP7JLm/m1bvsdaE=; b=WA5d/Hf9WHs8xN37IrcchuK40FNpk2dReRyQPuwfuJCaNgXg3iqQke//tAKw7jxYSn tm7ZCdeMldIIcqWgsLVRT+Eq3Z/PIg1rVM7RXKHgutLF+pxPuNxZRN3X8lJKP67qZTOr Qqq4pGlvflMqjet4l77yFYeLzUK7kb3AzsQVVyAzuGGdhPGRVGN8baykORo+mni7O3HJ Hsa3KZgV4eqRj2aA9xmgl4SRYVIlvW4u19CvPcWX7FcGQFBhJG8/MAh8kpaG3RSccgSQ lZkqYszqxCk/ZPzZuV9wBsWzQfS0ff3CKh5g4xM+Elj/e2qhlkGs4wMDhBArvjfuLpeb kgfQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20221208 header.b=6soCqQ3P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id eg5-20020a056a00800500b00675807330d0si5555638pfb.351.2023.07.13.13.52.22; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:52:34 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20221208 header.b=6soCqQ3P; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233797AbjGMUMj (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:12:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:48202 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232123AbjGMUMh (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 16:12:37 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A380F1720 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:12:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1b9ed206018so11385ad.1 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:12:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1689279126; x=1691871126; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=OCbyQDFiXgp3czjaCN0LZJhyRPoDhTEyRb41OL4Vb5k=; b=6soCqQ3PQtWloijWJSLom2UhPzjnKQykn+yvtGsjJTX7/3RKSoO/WaqNq6llQ6I0GU oXuvHOGy0nOlCb54f3eoGBIGhZg4xpaSo3Mc0NkjATaPn+C8bIevlX/tHaWUi27Wpon9 /rjRzZJxuujTMScHueAo3gPCTL3IxkhW3ha5pvM6gNEqaJM1Lcgjz3e0FSNg401wWq5s RHr2FiknbmmzIS7AirqfX2lAcauOI8Xa4Wu9G2RqFw8BiW2jLJsmPEncO/3LK2NOgiqf Rthss3Npyg8+AlhEiLZUVgdOiqufcYQHwFVJG+U7ijkH+yLhfLTsMHxdBfwh48pLLZOV QZ5Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1689279126; x=1691871126; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:in-reply-to:date:references :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=OCbyQDFiXgp3czjaCN0LZJhyRPoDhTEyRb41OL4Vb5k=; b=XZ0f+oy5DLxmqav4ZIoVFKRj6ebjHvXWTJjo9c+WxJiwOCc9iBBYwE7IQF8+FOcoCN ZHxZoPbL47eOJ6UP4D1bLzopS8VhFli+Ri4nJcOafWh2GU4ObOwNG64Zq+t5SA/DxSsf YSnAjzCHskTfsbhkcFzqVtyUQlTqsKT4R7iZRI9svXSUTl+j9pfsNp4rqkXA9wtWMMpu lppNRfmqENYwbD6GjtWVDPydaBmYp3MZq1fO9njC3lN6jxQYS+bskJ9QDURfrFaOYqcR BrtZsOMjUBSr+sMcZTNYuciusLeAK3Mq6lcpXhrVF0UrBGGRTrcCetRwz0Th2Q1pBLws J6oQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLZWOb52MunUW/wO/dl0bRKXlCcVg4F1VDUQesH5TAydUu5ZgHj3 Fv2oPpEQGWfIzQemsiPUdrZPnA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e810:b0:1b9:d34c:c47c with SMTP id u16-20020a170902e81000b001b9d34cc47cmr568828plg.8.1689279126500; Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bsegall-glaptop.localhost (c-73-158-249-138.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.158.249.138]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fe21-20020a056a002f1500b0064d681c753csm5836265pfb.40.2023.07.13.13.12.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:12:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Benjamin Segall To: Phil Auld Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Bristot de Oliveira , Peter Zijlstra , Vincent Guittot , Dietmar Eggemann , Valentin Schneider , Steven Rostedt , Mel Gorman , Frederic Weisbecker , Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched, cgroup: Restore meaning to hierarchical_quota References: <20230712133357.381137-1-pauld@redhat.com> <20230712133357.381137-2-pauld@redhat.com> <20230713132306.GA13342@lorien.usersys.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2023 13:12:04 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20230713132306.GA13342@lorien.usersys.redhat.com> (Phil Auld's message of "Thu, 13 Jul 2023 09:23:06 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Phil Auld writes: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 03:09:31PM -0700 Benjamin Segall wrote: >> Phil Auld writes: >> >> > In cgroupv2 cfs_b->hierarchical_quota is set to -1 for all task >> > groups due to the previous fix simply taking the min. It should >> > reflect a limit imposed at that level or by an ancestor. Even >> > though cgroupv2 does not require child quota to be less than or >> > equal to that of its ancestors the task group will still be >> > constrained by such a quota so this should be shown here. Cgroupv1 >> > continues to set this correctly. >> > >> > In both cases, add initialization when a new task group is created >> > based on the current parent's value (or RUNTIME_INF in the case of >> > root_task_group). Otherwise, the field is wrong until a quota is >> > changed after creation and __cfs_schedulable() is called. >> > >> > Fixes: c53593e5cb69 ("sched, cgroup: Don't reject lower cpu.max on ancestors") >> > Signed-off-by: Phil Auld >> > Reviewed-by: Ben Segall >> > Cc: Ingo Molnar >> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra >> > Cc: Vincent Guittot >> > Cc: Juri Lelli >> > Cc: Dietmar Eggemann >> > Cc: Valentin Schneider >> > Cc: Ben Segall >> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker >> > Cc: Tejun Heo >> > --- >> > >> > v2: Improve comment about how setting hierarchical_quota correctly >> > >> > helps the scheduler. Remove extra parens. >> > kernel/sched/core.c | 13 +++++++++---- >> > kernel/sched/fair.c | 7 ++++--- >> > kernel/sched/sched.h | 2 +- >> > 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c >> > index a68d1276bab0..f80697a79baf 100644 >> > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c >> > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c >> > @@ -9904,7 +9904,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void) >> > ptr += nr_cpu_ids * sizeof(void **); >> > >> > root_task_group.shares = ROOT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD; >> > - init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth); >> > + init_cfs_bandwidth(&root_task_group.cfs_bandwidth, NULL); >> > #endif /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */ >> > #ifdef CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED >> > root_task_group.rt_se = (struct sched_rt_entity **)ptr; >> > @@ -11038,11 +11038,16 @@ static int tg_cfs_schedulable_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data) >> > >> > /* >> > * Ensure max(child_quota) <= parent_quota. On cgroup2, >> > - * always take the min. On cgroup1, only inherit when no >> > - * limit is set: >> > + * always take the non-RUNTIME_INF min. On cgroup1, only >> > + * inherit when no limit is set. In cgroup2 this is used >> > + * by the scheduler to determine if a given CFS task has a >> > + * bandwidth constraint at some higher level. >> > */ >> >> It's still used for determining this on cgroup1 (and the cgroup1 code >> still works for that), right? >> > > It would, except that the enforcement of child quota <= parent quota > means that cfs_rq->runtime_enabled will be set and we'll hit that first > on cgroup1. So we don't really use it for this determination in > cgroup1. cgroup1 tg_cfs_schedulable_down only constricts child quota when it's set. You can set quota=RUNTIME_INF on any cgroup, no matter what its parent is. (The schedulable constraint is a little silly)